• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Johnson Strategies

Planning, Communications, Advocacy

  • Home
  • The JS Story
  • About JS
    • Mission
    • About Scott
    • Writing
  • Videos
  • Library
    • AOB prior to reforms effective July 1, 2019
    • AOB on and after reforms effective July 1, 2019
    • Citizens
    • Legislative Glossary
    • Government Studies and Reports
    • Miscellaneous Documents
    • Presentations and Powerpoints
  • Links
    • Government
    • Other Helpful Sites
  • Contact
You are here: Home / Advocacy / STREMS—The Final Chapter?

STREMS—The Final Chapter?

January 23, 2023 - Opinions by Scott Johnson Leave a Comment

Share this articleEmail this to someoneShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInTweet about this on Twitter

I promise this is my last word on the Strems saga… probably.  Recall my last post “Collapse of an Evil Empire…DISBARRED!” where I wrote that “…based on his cumulative behavior”  the Supreme Court of Florida (SCOF) had finally ruled to “disbar” Scot Strems. I mistakenly said the disbarment was “permanent.”

Now comes the Strems team which responded with a petition for rehearing to replace the “non-permanent” disbarment with a 3-year rehabilitative suspension.  They also propose that the requested suspension become effective when Strems was first suspended back in June of 2020.  If granted, Strems could begin practicing law as early as June 9 of this year. 

Once again, The Bar’s tenacious and talented prosecutor, Derek Womack, has other ideas. He’s already filed a Response in Opposition to the Strems motion reminding SCOF that “A motion for rehearing is not an open invitation for an unhappy litigant or attorney to reargue the same points previously presented.” Instead, Womack says, it’s required to state, “with particularity,” the points of law or fact the court has “overlooked or misapprehended.”  And, according to Womack “Mr. Strems does not argue that this Court was mistaken about the facts or Misapprehended…” nor does his team argue the court “…overlooked the law in rejecting a mitigating factor, in finding an additional aggravating factor, or in applying the prior precedent addressing disbarment.”

I’ve had numerous conversations with those familiar with such matters and all indicated the decision to disbar “non-permanently” doesn’t make “reapplication” automatic or even easy.  In fact, reapplying is permitted only after five years, in most cases, including this one.

Also… proving you’ve been rehabilitated is no cakewalk. Rehab includes the kind of rigorous background check my sources referred to as “the mother of all background checks”—addresses, academic records, traffic tickets, litigation, employment, affiliations, bank records, etc. all the way back to law school, which for Strems is 2007.  And, even if rehab is achieved and proven, the court still isn’t bound to grant readmission.  The analogy from one source was the parole board in the Shawshank Redemption— “they just keep stamping ‘DENIED’ and that’s it!”

And, of course, Strems would also have to pass the Bar exam, again.

For those arguing he should’ve just been permanently disbarred, it’s true… had his disbarment been “permanent,” Strems would likely never work as a practicing attorney again anywhere.  Technically, however, that wasn’t an option; “…Although he has certainly engaged in ethically questionable behavior,” SCOF declared, “he has not demonstrated that he is not amenable to rehabilitation. Permanent disbarment is warranted only where an attorney’s conduct indicates he or she engages in a persistent course of unrepentant and egregious misconduct and is beyond redemption.” It’s noteworthy that Florida is one of only a handful of states where permanent disbarment is even an option.

Some Perspective— The high courts’ non-permanent decision doesn’t mean, however, that Strems or any attorney so situated will have an easy time returning to the practice of law, even in 5 years.

Annually The Bar might investigate approximately 3,400 cases of attorney misconduct–only about 200-300 resulting in any disciplinary action.  During a recent period, out of 377 revocations, only 54 were permanent.

According to the Florida Bar’s Lawyer Discipline Statistics, from 1992 to 2008 1,179 lawyers were disbarred or experienced some form of disciplinary action resulting in resignation. But only 28 — slightly over 2% — were successful in applying for readmission and went through the entire process.  Another 19 applied and were rejected before even getting started.

In summary—Unless SCOF rules favorably on Strems petition, he has the option to reapply five years from the date of his disbarment as long as he’s paid the $45,563.34 judgement covering the costs of the Florida Bar.  Both his reapplication and his willingness to go through the process (after spending 5 years doing something else) is far from assured–98% either don’t try or don’t make it.

Another Point of View–Frankly, there’s also another way to look at it.  Ask yourself, “what difference would it make how the Supreme Court rules on Strems petition?”

Thanks to the legislatures’ hard work during the December Special Session, Plaintiff attorneys now play by starkly different rules.  And, in five years those new rules will have created new norms of behavior.

Fact is, the unethical practices Strems and other firms were engaging in are no longer just unethical, some are now specifically illegal.  Heck, with the removal of the big carrots–one-way attorney fees and fee multipliers—and no more AOB and with Bad Faith reform, and a dozen or so smaller improvements… who cares whether one more attorney trolls for billable hours.

That’s the beauty of SB-2A and what lawmakers did in the 2023 Special Session reforms!

 My opinion of course.

##end##

IMPORTANT: If you enjoyed this post you’re invited to subscribe for automatic notifications by going to: www.johnsonstrategiesllc.com.  Enter your email address where indicated.  If you’re already on the website at Johnson Strategies, LLC, go to the home page and enter your email address on the right-hand side.  Remember, you’ll receive an email confirming your acceptance, so…check and clear your spam filter for notifications from Johnson Strategies, LLC.  ENJOY!

 

Share this articleEmail this to someoneShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInTweet about this on Twitter

Filed Under: Advocacy

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Primary Sidebar

Unless otherwise attributed, articles on this site are the opinions of Scott Johnson.

To subscribe to Scott’s blog…

JS Contributors

David Thompson, AAI, CPCU, CRIS
David Thompson has a well-deserved reputation across the country as a preeminent expert in the Property & Casualty field. Learn more
Bill Wilson, CPCU, ARM, AIM, AAM
Bill is one of the most respected speakers and writers on P & C issues in the U.S. He is recognized by his peers as someone who can explain complicated technical subjects in an easily understood and interesting fashion. His list of accomplishments and awards is legendary. For good reason his books, articles and consulting services are in continuous demand. Learn more
Barry Zalma, ESQ. CFE
Johnson Strategies has relied upon Mr. Zalma on numerous occasions for his research and insight into matters of insurance fraud, bad faith, relevant case law and expert analysis. Learn more

Order Scott’s Books

What's Past is Prologue

Lessons from the Worst Insurance Crisis in Florida’s History... ASSIGNMENT OF BENEFITS

Fact & Fallacy

Essays & Opinions on Florida's Most Controversial Insurance Topics.

Platforms of Success

What the New Generation of Elite Sellers are Doing and How it Can Work for You!

From Cartels to Competition

The Evolution of Insurance and the History of Florida’s Independent Agent

Recent blog posts

  • Needed PA Reforms!
  • WINDSHIELD BULLIES!
  • PUBLIC ADJUSTER FEES…2.5%!
  • Supreme Court Rules…FINALLY!
  • STREMS—The Final Chapter?

Blog Archive

  • March 2023 (1)
  • February 2023 (3)
  • January 2023 (1)
  • December 2022 (2)
  • November 2022 (1)
  • August 2022 (2)
  • July 2022 (1)
  • June 2022 (1)
  • May 2022 (2)
  • March 2022 (4)
  • February 2022 (3)
  • January 2022 (3)
  • November 2021 (2)
  • October 2021 (3)
  • September 2021 (1)
  • August 2021 (3)
  • July 2021 (4)
  • April 2021 (5)
  • March 2021 (3)
  • February 2021 (6)
  • January 2021 (6)
  • December 2020 (2)
  • October 2020 (3)
  • September 2020 (2)
  • August 2020 (2)
  • July 2020 (1)
  • June 2020 (2)
  • April 2020 (1)
  • March 2020 (1)
  • February 2020 (1)
  • January 2020 (1)
  • August 2019 (2)
  • June 2019 (1)
  • March 2019 (1)
  • January 2019 (1)
  • December 2018 (1)
  • November 2018 (1)
  • September 2018 (1)
  • July 2018 (1)
  • June 2018 (2)
  • October 2017 (2)
  • September 2017 (1)
  • August 2017 (1)
  • June 2017 (1)
  • April 2017 (2)
  • March 2017 (2)
  • February 2017 (1)
  • December 2016 (1)
  • October 2016 (1)
  • August 2016 (2)
  • July 2016 (1)
  • June 2016 (1)
  • March 2016 (2)
  • February 2016 (1)
  • January 2016 (2)
  • November 2015 (1)
  • October 2015 (1)
  • September 2015 (1)
  • August 2015 (2)
  • July 2015 (2)
  • June 2015 (2)
  • May 2015 (1)
  • April 2015 (2)
  • March 2015 (1)
  • February 2015 (3)
  • January 2015 (1)
  • December 2014 (2)
  • November 2014 (4)
  • October 2014 (1)
  • September 2014 (2)
  • August 2014 (2)
  • July 2014 (2)
  • June 2014 (2)
  • May 2014 (3)
  • April 2014 (2)
  • March 2014 (3)
  • February 2014 (3)
  • January 2014 (2)
  • December 2013 (2)
  • November 2013 (2)
  • October 2013 (2)
  • September 2013 (2)
  • August 2013 (2)
  • July 2013 (3)
  • June 2013 (2)
  • May 2013 (3)
  • April 2013 (2)
  • March 2013 (3)
  • February 2013 (5)
  • January 2013 (2)
  • December 2012 (4)
  • November 2012 (3)
  • October 2012 (4)
  • August 2012 (5)
  • July 2012 (5)
  • June 2012 (4)
  • May 2012 (3)
  • April 2012 (7)
  • March 2012 (3)
  • February 2012 (3)
  • January 2012 (5)
  • December 2011 (6)
  • November 2011 (7)
  • October 2011 (6)
  • September 2011 (2)
  • August 2011 (7)
  • July 2011 (7)
  • June 2011 (4)
  • May 2011 (4)

Tag Cloud

7-7-7 Plan Citizens Insurance oir Rick Scott sb-480 senator fasano senator richter
Unless otherwise attributed, articles on this site are the opinions of Scott Johnson.

Mission: Satisfaction Guaranteed

Johnson Strategies (JS) works to establish and achieve goals promoting products or idea's to customers, state policymakers and the consuming public. This is done on behalf of both corporate and individual clients, non-profit trade associations and membership societies. JS specializes in planning, communication and advocacy for a wide range of interests focused in the property and casualty insurance field. Our simple mission is to guarantee satisfaction based on a comprehensive needs analysis and mutually defined goals.

Categories

Popular Tags

7-7-7 Plan Citizens Insurance oir Rick Scott sb-480 senator fasano senator richter

Post Calendar

March 2023
M T W T F S S
« Feb    
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Recent Posts

  • Needed PA Reforms!
  • WINDSHIELD BULLIES!
  • PUBLIC ADJUSTER FEES…2.5%!
  • Supreme Court Rules…FINALLY!
  • STREMS—The Final Chapter?
  • Collapse of an Evil Empire…DISBARRED!
  • A Great First Step…

Copyright 2012, Johnson Strategies LLC. Website design/development by Cali Design LLC