• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Johnson Strategies

Planning, Communications, Advocacy

  • Home
  • The JS Story
  • About JS
    • Mission
    • About Scott
    • Writing
  • Videos
  • Library
    • AOB prior to reforms effective July 1, 2019
    • AOB on and after reforms effective July 1, 2019
    • Citizens
    • Legislative Glossary
    • Government Studies and Reports
    • Miscellaneous Documents
    • Presentations and Powerpoints
  • Links
    • Government
    • Other Helpful Sites
  • Contact
You are here: Home / Automobile / PIP Debate…All About Wasted Time!

PIP Debate…All About Wasted Time!

November 25, 2013 - Opinions by Scott Johnson Leave a Comment

Now that 2014 is almost here, to still be debating repeal vs. reform of No-Fault is like déjà vu all over again.

I  remember walking the halls of the “old” capital building in 1971 distributing talking points on why lawmakers should implement one of America’s first No-Fault systems. I was, of course, too young and inexperienced to fully understand what was going on.

Insurance Commissioner, Tom O’Malley, was just elected having campaigned on the concept. The Governor supported No-Fault and the Chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee, Fred Karl, along with his Vice Chairman, Dempsey Barron were equally committed to reducing litigation that was smothering Florida’s auto accident system.

After much consternation HB-1821 was handed to Governor Rueben Askew who signed into law what was touted as “..the most far-reaching, meaningful, no-fault reform in the country.”

However, both the celebration and a 15% rate reduction were surprisingly brief.

In 1973 I was handing out more reform flyers and did so again to reform those reforms in 1976 and in 1977.  Always it was to fix what the courts and the emerging throng of cottage fraudsters had eroded, and …always accompanied by the plea to give the previous reforms a chance to work.

In 1978 the venue shifted to the “new” capital building and the flyers, titled “300-Words or Less About Insurance” featured talking points on reform needed to shore up the  verbal threshold enacted as part of the 1976 reforms.  (See NOTE#2 below).

Each time, every time, almost every year …lawmakers implemented reforms amidst plea’s to “…give the previous reforms a chance to work!”

In the ’80’s it was déjà vu all over again, again. (See NOTE #3 below)

Then, from 1989 to 1997 even more changes were needed as PIP was increasingly embraced by those traditionally opposed to it. This lead to the anti-fraud provisions implemented with HB-3889.

In 1999 HB-295 further modified PIP and was accompanied by major tort reform in HB-775, much of which directly targeted fraud which had continued to skyrocket.

Abusers continued to proliferate and by the turn of the century organized crime involvement and staged accidents fueled a  startling grand jury report and another major rewrite yielding another chorus of “give the previous reforms a chance to work!”

In a 2003 Special Session even more major PIP reform was implemented and, believe it or not, I was involved with more talking points–some of which sounded like those I had distributed 30 years prior.

Finally…in 2012 lawmakers proved once again they didn’t have the stomach for “real” reform by enacting a watered down version of CS/HB-119 which is now (surprise, surprise) besieged by legal challenges. (See NOTE #5 below)

So, “what’s the point?” you ask.

Well, when I hear there are some in the insurance industry who still believe, despite the above, that we should give the previous reforms a chance to work, I can only say…

                  ARE YOU KIDDING ME!?!

I get it…we don’t want to replace a horrible system of mandatory $10,000 PIP with an equally horrible system of mandatory $10,000 Medical Payments, but …desires don’t erase facts!

And the facts prove two things: one, the current system doesn’t work, and; two, it cannot be made to work on any permanent and material basis.

What does it take for those who want a working system to realize this?

What is it about the last forty years they don’t understand?

Earlier this month Chairman of the Senate Banking & Insurance Committee David Simmons (R-Seminole, Volusia) said that out of $3.4 billion in auto premiums over $1 billion is for PIP fraud.

“We’ve had 40 years of fixes trying to resolve the PIP problem and here we are again!”  he lamented.

Data reveals that 92.1% of insured Florida drivers already carry Bodily Injury coverage and that 25.4% of the same insured’s also purchase Medical Payments. Chairman Simmons simply wants that to be the law of the land minus PIP. (See NOTE #4 below).

It’s hard to believe some insurers can still oppose him on this.

Forty years of history confirms that time spent giving previous reforms a chance to work is nothing more than time wasted!

It’s time to stop wasting time defending the indefensible and invest time reforming Florida’s abusive bad faith statutes. Nothing could lower costs for consumers more than that! (See NOTE #6 below)

The industry should unite behind Senator Simmons and other like-minded lawmakers to repeal the last vestige of America’s regrettable No-Fault mistake.

##end##

NOTE 1: For a complete review of the current debate regarding No-Fault and many relevant documents see my previous blogs, as follows:

“PIP…Now’s the Time!”.

“Auto PIP Analysis-Be Careful”

“No PIP or the PIP we’ve got”

“PIP Reform…A Big Week”

NOTE #2: No-Fault reforms in the 1970’s included: 1972–$25,000 in B.I. required (ch. 72-297); 1973—Repealed the $25,000 B.I. requirement and replaced it with 15/30 (ch. 73-186); 1976—Changed 15/30 to 10/20/5 and replaced $1,000 tort threshold with a verbal threshold and added PIP deductible of $2,000. (ch. 76-266); 1977- Benefit changed to 80% medical, PIP deductibles of $3,000 and $4,000 were added, with only $5,000 in PIP required.  Eliminated the compulsory nature of BI and PD unless subject to FR law (first bite of apple is free).  (ch.77-468); 1978—Tightened verbal threshold and the minimum raised to $10,000 from $5,000,  deductibles of $6,000 & $$8,000 added.

NOTE #3: From ’82 to ’88 the law was fine-tuned numerous times, including increasing funeral benefits to $1,750 from $1,000. In 1988 lawmakers again passed major reform requiring proof of financial responsibility in addition to  PIP and including property damage liability of $10,000.  In 1989 death benefits were raised to $5,000.

NOTE #4: Some highlights of Senator Simmons proposal are:

  • Repeals  No-Fault  and requires Financial Responsibility (FR) of either $60k for combined single limit or $25k/$50k/$10
  • Proof of FR in lieu of a policy must be in the amount of $60k (up from $30k); private individuals who self-insure private passenger vehicles possess a net unencumbered financial worth of at least $60k (up from $40k)
  • Also being considered is the requirement of $10,000 of Medical Payments limited only to   ambulance services, emergency room  and medically necessary services from a licensed hospital.

NOTE #5: In the most recent development over the 2012 PIP reforms the chiropractors, massage therapists and acupuncturists previously rebuffed for lack of standing, have filed a motion  arguing that the previous DCA three-judge panel erred. More to come.

NOTE #6: In Colorado, which repealed its no-fault law in 2003, the average injury payment per vehicle decreased 27 percent the year after the change to $223. Average premium costs also fell 15 percent to $476 in the two years. Reforming bad faith statutes and returning to a tort based system is anticipated to have an even greater impact on Florida’s costs.

IMPORTANT: If you enjoyed this post you’re invited to subscribe for automatic notifications by going to: www.johnsonstrategiesllc.com.  Enter your email address where indicated.  If you’re already on the website at Johnson Strategies, LLC, go to the home page and enter your email address on the right hand side.  Remember, you’ll receive an email confirming your acceptance, so…check and clear your spam filter for notifications from Johnson Strategies, LLC.  ENJOY!

facebookShare on Facebook
TwitterPost on X
FollowFollow us
PinterestSave

Filed Under: Automobile

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Primary Sidebar

Unless otherwise attributed, articles on this site are the opinions of Scott Johnson.

To subscribe to Scott’s blog…

JS Contributors

Don Brown
Particularly on insurance issues, Don Brown brings expert legislative acumen to the JS team. First elected in 2000 he emerged as an architect on numerous insurance related reforms, predominantly Property Insurance. He’s been an independent insurance agent for over 25 years and is currently a sought-after speaker, consultant and author. Learn more
David Thompson, AAI, CPCU, CRIS
David Thompson has a well-deserved reputation across the country as a preeminent expert in the Property & Casualty field. Learn more
Bill Wilson, CPCU, ARM, AIM, AAM
Bill is one of the most respected speakers and writers on P & C issues in the U.S. He is recognized by his peers as someone who can explain complicated technical subjects in an easily understood and interesting fashion. His list of accomplishments and awards is legendary. For good reason his books, articles and consulting services are in continuous demand. Learn more
Barry Zalma, ESQ. CFE
Johnson Strategies has relied upon Mr. Zalma on numerous occasions for his research and insight into matters of insurance fraud, bad faith, relevant case law and expert analysis. Learn more

Order Scott’s Books

Collapse of an Evil Empire

Fraud and greed pushed home insurers to the brink. Something bold had to be done. This is the story of the disbarment of Florida’s most prolific litigator leading to the most comprehensive tort reforms in Florida, and perhaps American, history.

What's Past is Prologue

Lessons from the Worst Insurance Crisis in Florida’s History... ASSIGNMENT OF BENEFITS

Fact & Fallacy

Essays & Opinions on Florida's Most Controversial Insurance Topics.

Platforms of Success

What the New Generation of Elite Sellers are Doing and How it Can Work for You!

From Cartels to Competition

The Evolution of Insurance and the History of Florida’s Independent Agent

Recent blog posts

  • AGENTS, ADJUSTERS, INSURERS BEWARE—THE RED FLAGS OF FRAUD!
  • The Delicate Balance: Addressing MGA Concerns Without Creating Market Uncertainty
  • Are Florida’s MGA’s Under Attack?!
  • A Smarter Approach to Hurricane-Resilient Homes and Insurance Stability…
  • How Do Other Jurisdictions Manage Hurricane Risk Exposure?

Blog Archive

  • April 2025 (1)
  • March 2025 (2)
  • February 2025 (2)
  • January 2025 (2)
  • October 2024 (3)
  • September 2024 (2)
  • August 2024 (2)
  • May 2024 (1)
  • January 2024 (1)
  • October 2023 (4)
  • September 2023 (2)
  • April 2023 (1)
  • March 2023 (2)
  • February 2023 (3)
  • January 2023 (1)
  • December 2022 (2)
  • November 2022 (1)
  • August 2022 (2)
  • July 2022 (1)
  • June 2022 (1)
  • May 2022 (2)
  • March 2022 (4)
  • February 2022 (3)
  • January 2022 (3)
  • November 2021 (2)
  • October 2021 (3)
  • September 2021 (1)
  • August 2021 (3)
  • July 2021 (4)
  • April 2021 (5)
  • March 2021 (3)
  • February 2021 (6)
  • January 2021 (6)
  • December 2020 (2)
  • October 2020 (3)
  • September 2020 (2)
  • August 2020 (2)
  • July 2020 (1)
  • June 2020 (2)
  • April 2020 (1)
  • March 2020 (1)
  • February 2020 (1)
  • January 2020 (1)
  • August 2019 (2)
  • June 2019 (1)
  • March 2019 (1)
  • January 2019 (1)
  • December 2018 (1)
  • November 2018 (1)
  • September 2018 (1)
  • July 2018 (1)
  • June 2018 (2)
  • October 2017 (2)
  • September 2017 (1)
  • August 2017 (1)
  • June 2017 (1)
  • April 2017 (2)
  • March 2017 (2)
  • February 2017 (1)
  • December 2016 (1)
  • October 2016 (1)
  • August 2016 (2)
  • July 2016 (1)
  • June 2016 (1)
  • March 2016 (2)
  • February 2016 (1)
  • January 2016 (2)
  • November 2015 (1)
  • October 2015 (1)
  • September 2015 (1)
  • August 2015 (2)
  • July 2015 (2)
  • June 2015 (2)
  • May 2015 (1)
  • April 2015 (2)
  • March 2015 (1)
  • February 2015 (3)
  • January 2015 (1)
  • December 2014 (2)
  • November 2014 (4)
  • October 2014 (1)
  • September 2014 (2)
  • August 2014 (2)
  • July 2014 (2)
  • June 2014 (2)
  • May 2014 (3)
  • April 2014 (2)
  • March 2014 (3)
  • February 2014 (3)
  • January 2014 (2)
  • December 2013 (2)
  • November 2013 (2)
  • October 2013 (2)
  • September 2013 (2)
  • August 2013 (2)
  • July 2013 (3)
  • June 2013 (2)
  • May 2013 (3)
  • April 2013 (2)
  • March 2013 (3)
  • February 2013 (5)
  • January 2013 (2)
  • December 2012 (4)
  • November 2012 (3)
  • October 2012 (4)
  • August 2012 (5)
  • July 2012 (5)
  • June 2012 (4)
  • May 2012 (3)
  • April 2012 (7)
  • March 2012 (3)
  • February 2012 (3)
  • January 2012 (5)
  • December 2011 (6)
  • November 2011 (7)
  • October 2011 (6)
  • September 2011 (2)
  • August 2011 (7)
  • July 2011 (7)
  • June 2011 (4)
  • May 2011 (4)

Tag Cloud

7-7-7 Plan Citizens Insurance oir Rick Scott sb-480 senator fasano senator richter
Unless otherwise attributed, articles on this site are the opinions of Scott Johnson.

Mission: Satisfaction Guaranteed

Johnson Strategies (JS) works to establish and achieve goals promoting products or idea's to customers, state policymakers and the consuming public. This is done on behalf of both corporate and individual clients, non-profit trade associations and membership societies. JS specializes in planning, communication and advocacy for a wide range of interests focused in the property and casualty insurance field. Our simple mission is to guarantee satisfaction based on a comprehensive needs analysis and mutually defined goals.

Categories

Popular Tags

7-7-7 Plan Citizens Insurance oir Rick Scott sb-480 senator fasano senator richter

Post Calendar

May 2025
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  
« Apr    

Recent Posts

  • AGENTS, ADJUSTERS, INSURERS BEWARE—THE RED FLAGS OF FRAUD!
  • The Delicate Balance: Addressing MGA Concerns Without Creating Market Uncertainty
  • Are Florida’s MGA’s Under Attack?!
  • A Smarter Approach to Hurricane-Resilient Homes and Insurance Stability…
  • How Do Other Jurisdictions Manage Hurricane Risk Exposure?
  • PART II of “What Agents Need to Know About Public Adjusters…
  • Latest Decision on AOB!

[footer_backtotop]

Copyright 2012, Johnson Strategies LLC. Website design/development by Cali Design LLC