• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Johnson Strategies

Planning, Communications, Advocacy

  • Home
  • The JS Story
  • About JS
    • Mission
    • About Scott
    • Writing
  • Videos
  • Library
    • AOB prior to reforms effective July 1, 2019
    • AOB on and after reforms effective July 1, 2019
    • Citizens
    • Legislative Glossary
    • Government Studies and Reports
    • Miscellaneous Documents
    • Presentations and Powerpoints
  • Links
    • Government
    • Other Helpful Sites
  • Contact
You are here: Home / Advocacy / Supreme Court Rules…FINALLY!

Supreme Court Rules…FINALLY!

February 13, 2023 - Opinions by Scott Johnson Leave a Comment

Share this articleEmail this to someoneShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInTweet about this on Twitter

A few years back I opined that it seems like the courts spend a disproportional amount of time litigating the obvious.

Case in point. The appraisal clause in most homeowner’s policies is constructed to resolve disputes regarding the amount of a claim.  In “How Interested are the Disinterested?” I said it was “absurd” for Public Adjusters (PA’s) to act as both a “disinterested” appraiser while also being paid a contingency on the same claim.  

Most know the appraisal clause to be a simple method of alternative dispute resolution dating to the early foundations of modern property insurance, specifically the 1943 165-line Standard Fire Insurance Policy –every word of which was painfully scrutinized in my early insurance classes including, and most especially, the word “disinterested”.  It was never discussed, nor even contemplated, that this word, “disinterested,” would not only include someone who is “interested” but one who also stands to make more money the higher they appraise the damage.

Last week (February 9, 2023) the Supreme Court of Florida (SCOF) found in Parish v State Farm (No. SC21-172) that the existence of a contingency fee between a public adjusting firm and an insured disqualifies the retained public adjuster, the public adjusting firm, its officers, its LLC members, and anyone else who would benefit from the firm being paid by the appraisal award from being a “disinterested” appraiser.

In this case Parish hired Keys Claims Consultants as their Public Adjuster (PA) for a Hurricane Irma claim.  When State Farm objected to Key’s estimate Parish and Key’s invoked the appraisal clause and when Key chose his firm (himself) as the disinterested appraiser, State Farm took to the courts.

So, how big of a deal is this?

Well, I’ve talked to folks on both sides, and they all seem to think it’s a big enough deal to impact rates, as well as the fairness of the system. While I’m certain we’ll never be able to pinpoint how much, it’s got to have an attenuating impact in my opinion. (See Note #1 below)

Think about it.  There’s an obvious stimulant to inflate a claim when a PA can make more money on every claim due to a contract that pays more money the higher the claim payment is.  Since the PA can also be a disinterested party under appraisal and be paid for that as well, there’s another incentive to inflate the original claim so that appraisal can be invoked.  And, of course, as I’ve said before “A PA that acts as the appraiser for his client is being hired to judge whether or not he/she’s done a good job—essentially ruling on the accuracy of his/her own work product.” Which is “ridiculous.”

I did have one enlightened source explain that those PA’s making “decent” money from appraising may be charging only 10% on their contingency to be more competitive acquiring the original claim—knowing they’ll make it up with an appraisal fee which is often also paid based on a percentage. The question is…will those doing so now raise their 10% fee on the original claim to 20% with the hope of capturing the same income?

Who knows?  I surely don’t.  Either way, that could be remedied by lawmakers reducing the statutory fee cap to 10% across the board—something I, and others, have advocated for more than a decade. (See Note #2 below)

There’s also a bit of irony in SCOF’s decision in that it falls on the heels of the Special Session property reforms which include substantial amendments regarding the appraisal process.  (See staff analysis here.)

The point is, however, that SCOF’s decision, in addition to creating fairness in the appraisal process, will also have a salutary impact on “some” of the existing claim inflation and…that’s a good thing! (See Note #3 below)

##end##

Note #1: When I researched PA laws in other states a few years ago I found 14 states had fee caps for PA’s. Florida’s 20% cap was (and is) among the highest.  At the time Alabama did not allow Public Adjusting as it was considered to be the unlicensed practice of law.  Also at the time, Louisiana prohibited PA’s from charging a percentage of the claim. Listen to legislative testimony from Public Adjuster representatives (NAPIA and NJPIA) regarding fraud incentives from contingency fees (of 20%) here.

Note #2:  It might also eliminate delays in claim payments. According to a Citizens study and a report by the Office of Program Policy Analysis & Government Accountability (OPAGGA)… “As shown in the exhibit, when public adjusters represented policyholders, claims processing typically took between 132 to 296 days longer than claims without public adjuster representation.”  See page 6 “Citizens claims with public adjuster involvement took longer to close.”

Note #3: Here are some other suggestions for PA reforms that would have a material long term impact on Florida’s property loss costs.

  1. In the opinion of many, there is no need for “non-resident” public adjusters. The license (Fs. 626.8582) should be eliminated and PA’s from other states should be prohibited from practicing in Florida… whether there’s a hurricane or not. Frankly, this might be the first of my idea’s that Florida’s 1400 or so resident PA’s might like.  I’ve spoken to no one that opposes the idea of eliminating non-resident PA’s.
  2. Along with many others I believe it is bad public policy to pay Public Adjusters based on a percentage of a claim payment. According to testimony of those who represent Public Adjusters a percentage of, say… 20% (Florida’s cap) is an inducement to illegally inflate the claim or to “create a claim where one otherwise did not exist.”  The law should be changed to require that PA’s charge a reasonable hourly rate and let competition determine how much that rate is.
  3. Finally, I propose that the Speaker of the House and the President of the Senate immediately appoint a bi-partisan joint panel to study whether Florida should continue to utilize its’ current system of Public Adjusting. Some other states prohibit Public Adjusters and now that Florida has reformed attorney fees, it should investigate whether it’s feasible to let attorneys exclusively represent policyholders with disputed claims.

IMPORTANT: If you enjoyed this post you’re invited to subscribe for automatic notifications by going to: www.johnsonstrategiesllc.com.  Enter your email address where indicated.  If you’re already on the website at Johnson Strategies, LLC, go to the home page and enter your email address on the right-hand side.  Remember, you’ll receive an email confirming your acceptance, so…check and clear your spam filter for notifications from Johnson Strategies, LLC.  ENJOY!

 

 

 

 

Share this articleEmail this to someoneShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInTweet about this on Twitter

Filed Under: Advocacy

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Primary Sidebar

Unless otherwise attributed, articles on this site are the opinions of Scott Johnson.

To subscribe to Scott’s blog…

JS Contributors

David Thompson, AAI, CPCU, CRIS
David Thompson has a well-deserved reputation across the country as a preeminent expert in the Property & Casualty field. Learn more
Bill Wilson, CPCU, ARM, AIM, AAM
Bill is one of the most respected speakers and writers on P & C issues in the U.S. He is recognized by his peers as someone who can explain complicated technical subjects in an easily understood and interesting fashion. His list of accomplishments and awards is legendary. For good reason his books, articles and consulting services are in continuous demand. Learn more
Barry Zalma, ESQ. CFE
Johnson Strategies has relied upon Mr. Zalma on numerous occasions for his research and insight into matters of insurance fraud, bad faith, relevant case law and expert analysis. Learn more

Order Scott’s Books

What's Past is Prologue

Lessons from the Worst Insurance Crisis in Florida’s History... ASSIGNMENT OF BENEFITS

Fact & Fallacy

Essays & Opinions on Florida's Most Controversial Insurance Topics.

Platforms of Success

What the New Generation of Elite Sellers are Doing and How it Can Work for You!

From Cartels to Competition

The Evolution of Insurance and the History of Florida’s Independent Agent

Recent blog posts

  • Needed PA Reforms!
  • WINDSHIELD BULLIES!
  • PUBLIC ADJUSTER FEES…2.5%!
  • Supreme Court Rules…FINALLY!
  • STREMS—The Final Chapter?

Blog Archive

  • March 2023 (1)
  • February 2023 (3)
  • January 2023 (1)
  • December 2022 (2)
  • November 2022 (1)
  • August 2022 (2)
  • July 2022 (1)
  • June 2022 (1)
  • May 2022 (2)
  • March 2022 (4)
  • February 2022 (3)
  • January 2022 (3)
  • November 2021 (2)
  • October 2021 (3)
  • September 2021 (1)
  • August 2021 (3)
  • July 2021 (4)
  • April 2021 (5)
  • March 2021 (3)
  • February 2021 (6)
  • January 2021 (6)
  • December 2020 (2)
  • October 2020 (3)
  • September 2020 (2)
  • August 2020 (2)
  • July 2020 (1)
  • June 2020 (2)
  • April 2020 (1)
  • March 2020 (1)
  • February 2020 (1)
  • January 2020 (1)
  • August 2019 (2)
  • June 2019 (1)
  • March 2019 (1)
  • January 2019 (1)
  • December 2018 (1)
  • November 2018 (1)
  • September 2018 (1)
  • July 2018 (1)
  • June 2018 (2)
  • October 2017 (2)
  • September 2017 (1)
  • August 2017 (1)
  • June 2017 (1)
  • April 2017 (2)
  • March 2017 (2)
  • February 2017 (1)
  • December 2016 (1)
  • October 2016 (1)
  • August 2016 (2)
  • July 2016 (1)
  • June 2016 (1)
  • March 2016 (2)
  • February 2016 (1)
  • January 2016 (2)
  • November 2015 (1)
  • October 2015 (1)
  • September 2015 (1)
  • August 2015 (2)
  • July 2015 (2)
  • June 2015 (2)
  • May 2015 (1)
  • April 2015 (2)
  • March 2015 (1)
  • February 2015 (3)
  • January 2015 (1)
  • December 2014 (2)
  • November 2014 (4)
  • October 2014 (1)
  • September 2014 (2)
  • August 2014 (2)
  • July 2014 (2)
  • June 2014 (2)
  • May 2014 (3)
  • April 2014 (2)
  • March 2014 (3)
  • February 2014 (3)
  • January 2014 (2)
  • December 2013 (2)
  • November 2013 (2)
  • October 2013 (2)
  • September 2013 (2)
  • August 2013 (2)
  • July 2013 (3)
  • June 2013 (2)
  • May 2013 (3)
  • April 2013 (2)
  • March 2013 (3)
  • February 2013 (5)
  • January 2013 (2)
  • December 2012 (4)
  • November 2012 (3)
  • October 2012 (4)
  • August 2012 (5)
  • July 2012 (5)
  • June 2012 (4)
  • May 2012 (3)
  • April 2012 (7)
  • March 2012 (3)
  • February 2012 (3)
  • January 2012 (5)
  • December 2011 (6)
  • November 2011 (7)
  • October 2011 (6)
  • September 2011 (2)
  • August 2011 (7)
  • July 2011 (7)
  • June 2011 (4)
  • May 2011 (4)

Tag Cloud

7-7-7 Plan Citizens Insurance oir Rick Scott sb-480 senator fasano senator richter
Unless otherwise attributed, articles on this site are the opinions of Scott Johnson.

Mission: Satisfaction Guaranteed

Johnson Strategies (JS) works to establish and achieve goals promoting products or idea's to customers, state policymakers and the consuming public. This is done on behalf of both corporate and individual clients, non-profit trade associations and membership societies. JS specializes in planning, communication and advocacy for a wide range of interests focused in the property and casualty insurance field. Our simple mission is to guarantee satisfaction based on a comprehensive needs analysis and mutually defined goals.

Categories

Popular Tags

7-7-7 Plan Citizens Insurance oir Rick Scott sb-480 senator fasano senator richter

Post Calendar

March 2023
M T W T F S S
« Feb    
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Recent Posts

  • Needed PA Reforms!
  • WINDSHIELD BULLIES!
  • PUBLIC ADJUSTER FEES…2.5%!
  • Supreme Court Rules…FINALLY!
  • STREMS—The Final Chapter?
  • Collapse of an Evil Empire…DISBARRED!
  • A Great First Step…

Copyright 2012, Johnson Strategies LLC. Website design/development by Cali Design LLC