• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Johnson Strategies

Planning, Communications, Advocacy

  • Home
  • The JS Story
  • About JS
    • Mission
    • About Scott
    • Writing
  • Videos
  • Library
    • AOB prior to reforms effective July 1, 2019
    • AOB on and after reforms effective July 1, 2019
    • Citizens
    • Legislative Glossary
    • Government Studies and Reports
    • Miscellaneous Documents
    • Presentations and Powerpoints
  • Links
    • Government
    • Other Helpful Sites
  • Contact
You are here: Home / Advocacy / More Than One Way to Skin a Cat!

More Than One Way to Skin a Cat!

July 25, 2021 - Opinions by Scott Johnson Leave a Comment

Share this articleEmail this to someoneShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInTweet about this on Twitter

Some trial lawyers, aggressive roofers, public adjusters (PA’s) and others partially responsible for Florida having three fourths of America’s property insurance lawsuits, are quite pleased with themselves right now.

On June 21, 2021, only ten days after Governor DeSantis signed SB-76, roofing contractor Gale Force filed a complaint in Federal Court to stop specific provisions dealing with roofer “solicitations” from being enforced.

Gale Force argued that language prohibiting  “written or electronic communication that encourages, induces, or instructs someone to contact a contractor or public adjuster for the purpose of filing an insurance claim for roof damage” was unconstitutional and violated its’ First Amendment right to freedom of speech.

U.S. District Judge Mark Walker agreed and on July 11 granted an injunction prohibiting relevant paragraphs from being enforced by the Department of Business and Professional Regulation (DBPR). (See: Section 1, beginning on line 117)

Other portions of SB-76 (Sections 2 thru 14) have gone into effect, however, notably those improving the state’s one-way attorney fee statute, dealing  with the eligibility and glidepath of Citizens, and the reduced deadline to file claims.

In his 44 page opinion judge Walker said, “There is a difference between targeting disfavored conduct or practices (contractors acting as public adjusters, exploiting consumers, filing fraudulent claims, etc.) and targeting anything that may lead to that conduct— including truthful information that a consumer may have storm damage, and that storm damage may be covered by insurance.”  (See Note #1 below)

Before looking closer at the injunctions’ impact I should say that, regardless of anything else, I truly believe based on the performance of some in their ranks the solicitation practices of roofers are in bad need of reform—even the judge seemed to acknowledged as much.

I’ve received credible reports of vans pulling into neighborhoods dispatching a half dozen or so highly incentivized persons to, spread out, knock on doors and gather signatures. This, apparently as a means to prevent their competitors with similar business models from doing the same thing.  Among these door knockers are often some very aggressive folks, embellishing, exaggerating, intimidating their way to a bonus. Not illegal per se but, a clarion call for reform, in my opinion.

More than one consumer has shared with me their stories—which, in my opinion, show any number of laws are possibly broken with this type of approach–prime among them is the prohibition against the Unlicensed Practice of Public Adjusting or UPPA. (See: A Big Dog With No Teeth?!)

A sponsor of SB-76 said the final version signed by Governor DeSantis was only about 40% of what Florida really needs. Others, particularly those placing greater weight on the attorney fee reforms, believe that’s a bit high.

Here, in no particular order, are the reasons I believe Gale Force’s injunction is not as bad as it seems:

  • The provisions of SB-76 regarding the attorney fee statute make it less attractive for attorneys to file frivolous suits, the kind some contractors were filing when insurer’s balked at paying what they believed to be an inflated invoice. According to the Department of Financial Services (DFS) Gale Force has filed 73 suits against insurers just since June of 2017 (See DFS Service of Process record). Without regard to their merit, these suits, and those filed by other roofers, contribute to Florida’s standing as America’s property insurance litigation leader.  And their cost is reflected in policyholder premiums.  And, whether suits by roofers were settled, dropped or went to a jury, the new provisions of SB-76 regarding attorney fees will make it more difficult to find legal representation for those with a low likelihood of prevailing.   And that, in itself, might promote more careful behavior which, in turn, will reduce litigation costs even if solicitation tactics don’t change.
  • At the time this is being written the courts’ decision could be appealed by DBPR. No word on whether it will do so or not.
  • SB-1598 was also signed by Governor DeSantis and has not been similarly challenged. It makes some changes governing public adjusters which could have a salutary impact on the solicitation practices of some contractors and roofers, specifically: Prohibiting public adjusters from being paid by contractors or attorneys. (See Note #2 below)
  • Finally, assuming the injunction stands and does not impact the rest of SB-76, those who agree that roofer solicitation practices are in need of reform now have one approach they know will not work, constitutionally.  Some call that progress.

Most people I talk to agree that solicitation reforms are needed.  Next years drafters should keep this articles’ message in mind: when it comes to legislating against bad behavior there is always “More Than One Way to Skin a Cat.”

##end##

NOTE #1:  Aside from the law itself as implemented by the legislature via SB-76, there are three pertinent and current documents you should examine for details and the rationale for this decision.  They are: Gale Force Complaint for Injunctive & Declaratory Relief; DBPR’s Memorandum in Opposition to Gale Force’s Request; and, Judge Walker’s 44 page statement on his decision. There’s a lot to be learned about Gale Force’s specific complaint and how the law impacted its’ apparent business model.

NOTE #2: In addition to prohibiting public adjusters from being paid by contractors or attorneys, which was intended to eliminate “loss consultants” from being employed by law firms, other helpful provisions also remain with SB-1598, as follows:

Requiring a public adjuster to complete a detailed estimate within 60 days of signing a contract with an insured. The estimate must include an itemized per unit cost of the repairs. This will prevent the situation which occurred after Hurricane Michael when some public adjusters concentrated on soliciting customers and delayed presenting their estimates to their client and to their client’s insurance company for months or presented estimates which were incomplete. This was one of the causes of the unreasonable delays in settling some of those claims.

Requiring  public adjuster firms to be licensed by the State of Florida. Current law, which does not require public adjuster firms to be licensed, permits individuals who have lost their individual public adjuster license to continue in business by simply owning a public adjusting firm and hiring licensed individuals to work on their behalf.

Extending from 3 days to 10 days the time a consumer has to rescind a contract with a public adjuster.

Requiring standard disclosure language in all public adjuster contracts.

Please view “The Johnson Strategies Story”

IMPORTANT: If you enjoyed this post you’re invited to subscribe for automatic notifications by going to: www.johnsonstrategiesllc.com.  Enter your email address where indicated.  If you’re already on the website at Johnson Strategies, LLC, go to the home page and enter your email address on the right-hand side.  Remember, you’ll receive an email confirming your acceptance, so…check and clear your spam filter for notifications from Johnson Strategies, LLC.  ENJOY!

Share this articleEmail this to someoneShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInTweet about this on Twitter

Filed Under: Advocacy

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Primary Sidebar

Unless otherwise attributed, articles on this site are the opinions of Scott Johnson.

To subscribe to Scott’s blog…

JS Contributors

David Thompson, AAI, CPCU, CRIS
David Thompson has a well-deserved reputation across the country as a preeminent expert in the Property & Casualty field. Learn more
Bill Wilson, CPCU, ARM, AIM, AAM
Bill is one of the most respected speakers and writers on P & C issues in the U.S. He is recognized by his peers as someone who can explain complicated technical subjects in an easily understood and interesting fashion. His list of accomplishments and awards is legendary. For good reason his books, articles and consulting services are in continuous demand. Learn more
Barry Zalma, ESQ. CFE
Johnson Strategies has relied upon Mr. Zalma on numerous occasions for his research and insight into matters of insurance fraud, bad faith, relevant case law and expert analysis. Learn more

Order Scott’s Books

What's Past is Prologue

Lessons from the Worst Insurance Crisis in Florida’s History... ASSIGNMENT OF BENEFITS

Fact & Fallacy

Essays & Opinions on Florida's Most Controversial Insurance Topics.

Platforms of Success

What the New Generation of Elite Sellers are Doing and How it Can Work for You!

From Cartels to Competition

The Evolution of Insurance and the History of Florida’s Independent Agent

Recent blog posts

  • Needed PA Reforms!
  • WINDSHIELD BULLIES!
  • PUBLIC ADJUSTER FEES…2.5%!
  • Supreme Court Rules…FINALLY!
  • STREMS—The Final Chapter?

Blog Archive

  • March 2023 (1)
  • February 2023 (3)
  • January 2023 (1)
  • December 2022 (2)
  • November 2022 (1)
  • August 2022 (2)
  • July 2022 (1)
  • June 2022 (1)
  • May 2022 (2)
  • March 2022 (4)
  • February 2022 (3)
  • January 2022 (3)
  • November 2021 (2)
  • October 2021 (3)
  • September 2021 (1)
  • August 2021 (3)
  • July 2021 (4)
  • April 2021 (5)
  • March 2021 (3)
  • February 2021 (6)
  • January 2021 (6)
  • December 2020 (2)
  • October 2020 (3)
  • September 2020 (2)
  • August 2020 (2)
  • July 2020 (1)
  • June 2020 (2)
  • April 2020 (1)
  • March 2020 (1)
  • February 2020 (1)
  • January 2020 (1)
  • August 2019 (2)
  • June 2019 (1)
  • March 2019 (1)
  • January 2019 (1)
  • December 2018 (1)
  • November 2018 (1)
  • September 2018 (1)
  • July 2018 (1)
  • June 2018 (2)
  • October 2017 (2)
  • September 2017 (1)
  • August 2017 (1)
  • June 2017 (1)
  • April 2017 (2)
  • March 2017 (2)
  • February 2017 (1)
  • December 2016 (1)
  • October 2016 (1)
  • August 2016 (2)
  • July 2016 (1)
  • June 2016 (1)
  • March 2016 (2)
  • February 2016 (1)
  • January 2016 (2)
  • November 2015 (1)
  • October 2015 (1)
  • September 2015 (1)
  • August 2015 (2)
  • July 2015 (2)
  • June 2015 (2)
  • May 2015 (1)
  • April 2015 (2)
  • March 2015 (1)
  • February 2015 (3)
  • January 2015 (1)
  • December 2014 (2)
  • November 2014 (4)
  • October 2014 (1)
  • September 2014 (2)
  • August 2014 (2)
  • July 2014 (2)
  • June 2014 (2)
  • May 2014 (3)
  • April 2014 (2)
  • March 2014 (3)
  • February 2014 (3)
  • January 2014 (2)
  • December 2013 (2)
  • November 2013 (2)
  • October 2013 (2)
  • September 2013 (2)
  • August 2013 (2)
  • July 2013 (3)
  • June 2013 (2)
  • May 2013 (3)
  • April 2013 (2)
  • March 2013 (3)
  • February 2013 (5)
  • January 2013 (2)
  • December 2012 (4)
  • November 2012 (3)
  • October 2012 (4)
  • August 2012 (5)
  • July 2012 (5)
  • June 2012 (4)
  • May 2012 (3)
  • April 2012 (7)
  • March 2012 (3)
  • February 2012 (3)
  • January 2012 (5)
  • December 2011 (6)
  • November 2011 (7)
  • October 2011 (6)
  • September 2011 (2)
  • August 2011 (7)
  • July 2011 (7)
  • June 2011 (4)
  • May 2011 (4)

Tag Cloud

7-7-7 Plan Citizens Insurance oir Rick Scott sb-480 senator fasano senator richter
Unless otherwise attributed, articles on this site are the opinions of Scott Johnson.

Mission: Satisfaction Guaranteed

Johnson Strategies (JS) works to establish and achieve goals promoting products or idea's to customers, state policymakers and the consuming public. This is done on behalf of both corporate and individual clients, non-profit trade associations and membership societies. JS specializes in planning, communication and advocacy for a wide range of interests focused in the property and casualty insurance field. Our simple mission is to guarantee satisfaction based on a comprehensive needs analysis and mutually defined goals.

Categories

Popular Tags

7-7-7 Plan Citizens Insurance oir Rick Scott sb-480 senator fasano senator richter

Post Calendar

March 2023
M T W T F S S
« Feb    
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Recent Posts

  • Needed PA Reforms!
  • WINDSHIELD BULLIES!
  • PUBLIC ADJUSTER FEES…2.5%!
  • Supreme Court Rules…FINALLY!
  • STREMS—The Final Chapter?
  • Collapse of an Evil Empire…DISBARRED!
  • A Great First Step…

Copyright 2012, Johnson Strategies LLC. Website design/development by Cali Design LLC