• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Johnson Strategies

Planning, Communications, Advocacy

  • Home
  • The JS Story
  • About JS
    • Mission
    • About Scott
    • Writing
  • Videos
  • Library
    • AOB prior to reforms effective July 1, 2019
    • AOB on and after reforms effective July 1, 2019
    • Citizens
    • Legislative Glossary
    • Government Studies and Reports
    • Miscellaneous Documents
    • Presentations and Powerpoints
  • Links
    • Government
    • Other Helpful Sites
  • Contact
You are here: Home / Advocacy / How Interested are the Disinterested?

How Interested are the Disinterested?

November 17, 2021 - Opinions by Scott Johnson Leave a Comment

Share this articleEmail this to someoneShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInTweet about this on Twitter

You may remember my opinion about public adjusters who are paid a percentage of a claim also being allowed to act as “disinterested” appraisers under a policy’s appraisal clause. In June of 2020 I published an article (one which you should read titled Public Adjusters—How Interested are the Disinterested?) in which I said the practice may be on its way out.

The specific question had been referred to Florida’s supreme court in State Farm vs. Sanders (See NOTE #1 below) and I and many others opined the chances were high the practice would be prohibited going forward.  In summary there were (are) two basic issues:

  1. Can a public adjuster, paid via a contingency fee, be considered a “disinterested” appraiser on the same loss?
  2. Without regard to any contingency fee, can a public adjuster act as an appraiser for a policyholder they are also acting as an “agent” for?

My opinion (then and now) is that a PA acting as an appraiser for his client is hired to judge whether or not he’s done a good job—essentially ruling on the accuracy of his own work product. Ridiculous, but permissible unless the supreme court puts a stop to it, I said.

Now, if that PA is also paid on a contingency fee basis (which, in my experience, they always are) then, he/she is also further incentivized to approve of their own work product, (instead of a truly“ disinterested” person) and even their original estimate is likely to be higher as a result. (See NOTE #2 below)

Those on the other side argue that the insurer’s disinterested appraiser is incentivized to understate the value in order to keep getting referrals from the insurer. And that the umpire agreed upon by each side resolves any issue of bias from either side.

It’s been one year since the Supreme Court agreed to review the “disinterested” appraiser issue. It’s now done so based on the 3rd DCA having certified it as a question of great public importance and the conflicts the 3rd DCA had with other DCA’s. This made the Supreme Courts review discretionary.

Now, one year later, after the case had been fully briefed by the parties, and numerous industry organizations had filed briefs as “Friends of the Court”, and the attorneys presented oral arguments before a panel of six of the seven Florida Supreme Court judges, the Florida Supreme Court unanimously decided not to review the case.

Whatever the reasoning, the impact is to leave in place a conflict between two DCA’s. In the 5th and 4th DCA (and now also in the 2nd DCA), an insured’s public adjuster working on a contingency fee cannot serve as a “disinterested” appraiser. In the 3rd DCA he/she could serve as a “disinterested” appraiser, provided the financial relationship is disclosed.

It’s possible the justices didn’t consider the case to be in the correct procedural posture for its review, or it thought the facts in the Sanders case did not directly conflict with the other DCA’s or that the issue was not of great public importance.  The decision was cryptic enough that no one really seems to know the real reason.

Disappointing for sure, but…it’s the way it is, at least for now.

For those with additional questions, particularly on the impact, I highly recommend you read an article by Amy Koltnow and Michael Billmeier with the Colodny Fass Law firm titled: “Interested To Know Whether A Contingency Fee Public Adjuster Can serve As A ‘Disinterested’ Appraiser?”

##end##

______________________________________________________________________________

NOTE #1:  The case certified to the Supreme Court is State Farm v. Sanders in which State Farm petitioned the Third DCA to quash an order permitting Mr. & Mrs. Sanders’ public adjuster to act as their “disinterested” appraiser. Another case that also turns on the meaning of “disinterested” as contemplated by the parties’ contractual agreement is State Farm vs Beth Crispin. 

NOTE #2: Sometimes the appraisal clause uses the word “independent” instead of “disinterested” and the meaning can be interpreted differently than State Farm’s policy which uses “disinterested.”  Either way, the trend in Florida cases is clearly moving towards no appraisers being previously retained as public adjusters whether or not hired on a contingency fee basis.  See “Can PA’s on Contingency Fee Act as the Appraiser?”  by Chip Merlin, April 16, 2020

IMPORTANT: If you enjoyed this post you’re invited to subscribe for automatic notifications by going to: www.johnsonstrategiesllc.com.  Enter your email address where indicated.  If you’re already on the website at Johnson Strategies, LLC, go to the home page and enter your email address on the right-hand side.  Remember, you’ll receive an email confirming your acceptance, so…check and clear your spam filter for notifications from Johnson Strategies, LLC.  ENJOY!

 

Share this articleEmail this to someoneShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInTweet about this on Twitter

Filed Under: Advocacy

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Primary Sidebar

Unless otherwise attributed, articles on this site are the opinions of Scott Johnson.

To subscribe to Scott’s blog…

JS Contributors

David Thompson, AAI, CPCU, CRIS
David Thompson has a well-deserved reputation across the country as a preeminent expert in the Property & Casualty field. Learn more
Bill Wilson, CPCU, ARM, AIM, AAM
Bill is one of the most respected speakers and writers on P & C issues in the U.S. He is recognized by his peers as someone who can explain complicated technical subjects in an easily understood and interesting fashion. His list of accomplishments and awards is legendary. For good reason his books, articles and consulting services are in continuous demand. Learn more
Barry Zalma, ESQ. CFE
Johnson Strategies has relied upon Mr. Zalma on numerous occasions for his research and insight into matters of insurance fraud, bad faith, relevant case law and expert analysis. Learn more

Order Scott’s Books

What's Past is Prologue

Lessons from the Worst Insurance Crisis in Florida’s History... ASSIGNMENT OF BENEFITS

Fact & Fallacy

Essays & Opinions on Florida's Most Controversial Insurance Topics.

Platforms of Success

What the New Generation of Elite Sellers are Doing and How it Can Work for You!

From Cartels to Competition

The Evolution of Insurance and the History of Florida’s Independent Agent

Recent blog posts

  • Needed PA Reforms!
  • WINDSHIELD BULLIES!
  • PUBLIC ADJUSTER FEES…2.5%!
  • Supreme Court Rules…FINALLY!
  • STREMS—The Final Chapter?

Blog Archive

  • March 2023 (1)
  • February 2023 (3)
  • January 2023 (1)
  • December 2022 (2)
  • November 2022 (1)
  • August 2022 (2)
  • July 2022 (1)
  • June 2022 (1)
  • May 2022 (2)
  • March 2022 (4)
  • February 2022 (3)
  • January 2022 (3)
  • November 2021 (2)
  • October 2021 (3)
  • September 2021 (1)
  • August 2021 (3)
  • July 2021 (4)
  • April 2021 (5)
  • March 2021 (3)
  • February 2021 (6)
  • January 2021 (6)
  • December 2020 (2)
  • October 2020 (3)
  • September 2020 (2)
  • August 2020 (2)
  • July 2020 (1)
  • June 2020 (2)
  • April 2020 (1)
  • March 2020 (1)
  • February 2020 (1)
  • January 2020 (1)
  • August 2019 (2)
  • June 2019 (1)
  • March 2019 (1)
  • January 2019 (1)
  • December 2018 (1)
  • November 2018 (1)
  • September 2018 (1)
  • July 2018 (1)
  • June 2018 (2)
  • October 2017 (2)
  • September 2017 (1)
  • August 2017 (1)
  • June 2017 (1)
  • April 2017 (2)
  • March 2017 (2)
  • February 2017 (1)
  • December 2016 (1)
  • October 2016 (1)
  • August 2016 (2)
  • July 2016 (1)
  • June 2016 (1)
  • March 2016 (2)
  • February 2016 (1)
  • January 2016 (2)
  • November 2015 (1)
  • October 2015 (1)
  • September 2015 (1)
  • August 2015 (2)
  • July 2015 (2)
  • June 2015 (2)
  • May 2015 (1)
  • April 2015 (2)
  • March 2015 (1)
  • February 2015 (3)
  • January 2015 (1)
  • December 2014 (2)
  • November 2014 (4)
  • October 2014 (1)
  • September 2014 (2)
  • August 2014 (2)
  • July 2014 (2)
  • June 2014 (2)
  • May 2014 (3)
  • April 2014 (2)
  • March 2014 (3)
  • February 2014 (3)
  • January 2014 (2)
  • December 2013 (2)
  • November 2013 (2)
  • October 2013 (2)
  • September 2013 (2)
  • August 2013 (2)
  • July 2013 (3)
  • June 2013 (2)
  • May 2013 (3)
  • April 2013 (2)
  • March 2013 (3)
  • February 2013 (5)
  • January 2013 (2)
  • December 2012 (4)
  • November 2012 (3)
  • October 2012 (4)
  • August 2012 (5)
  • July 2012 (5)
  • June 2012 (4)
  • May 2012 (3)
  • April 2012 (7)
  • March 2012 (3)
  • February 2012 (3)
  • January 2012 (5)
  • December 2011 (6)
  • November 2011 (7)
  • October 2011 (6)
  • September 2011 (2)
  • August 2011 (7)
  • July 2011 (7)
  • June 2011 (4)
  • May 2011 (4)

Tag Cloud

7-7-7 Plan Citizens Insurance oir Rick Scott sb-480 senator fasano senator richter
Unless otherwise attributed, articles on this site are the opinions of Scott Johnson.

Mission: Satisfaction Guaranteed

Johnson Strategies (JS) works to establish and achieve goals promoting products or idea's to customers, state policymakers and the consuming public. This is done on behalf of both corporate and individual clients, non-profit trade associations and membership societies. JS specializes in planning, communication and advocacy for a wide range of interests focused in the property and casualty insurance field. Our simple mission is to guarantee satisfaction based on a comprehensive needs analysis and mutually defined goals.

Categories

Popular Tags

7-7-7 Plan Citizens Insurance oir Rick Scott sb-480 senator fasano senator richter

Post Calendar

March 2023
M T W T F S S
« Feb    
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Recent Posts

  • Needed PA Reforms!
  • WINDSHIELD BULLIES!
  • PUBLIC ADJUSTER FEES…2.5%!
  • Supreme Court Rules…FINALLY!
  • STREMS—The Final Chapter?
  • Collapse of an Evil Empire…DISBARRED!
  • A Great First Step…

Copyright 2012, Johnson Strategies LLC. Website design/development by Cali Design LLC