• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Johnson Strategies

Planning, Communications, Advocacy

  • Home
  • The JS Story
  • About JS
    • Mission
    • About Scott
    • Writing
  • Videos
  • Library
    • AOB prior to reforms effective July 1, 2019
    • AOB on and after reforms effective July 1, 2019
    • Citizens
    • Legislative Glossary
    • Government Studies and Reports
    • Miscellaneous Documents
    • Presentations and Powerpoints
  • Links
    • Government
    • Other Helpful Sites
  • Contact
You are here: Home / Citizens / CITIZENS SINKHOLES…Problem Solved?

CITIZENS SINKHOLES…Problem Solved?

October 2, 2011 - Opinions by Scott Johnson Leave a Comment

Except for the possibility of writing about the killing lawyers make off of frivolous sinkhole claims, I promise this to be my last word on this frustrating subject.   Besides, the issue of what rate would be approved for Citizens sinkhole activity coverage was always just a red herring–a distraction from the meaningful solutions already taking effect.

That’s right, raising sinkhole rates was the right thing to do, but… just like increasing rates wouldn’t solve the problems, having the request substantially reduced doesn’t mean the problems aren’t solved.

You see, exempting Citizens sinkhole rates from the 10% glide path was never seen as a reason for sinkhole alley consumers, currently spending thousands to purchase the coverage, to stop buying the coverage.  It was SB-408’s remaining reforms that do that. With the exception of the  exasperating “tail” issues, those reforms effectively address Citizens sinkhole problems going forward and they remain remarkably unscathed by either the media or cottage industry adversaries distracted by the 2000% proposed increase.

Ironic isn’t it, that Senator Fasano and Sean Shaw won a lower price but will still have fewer purchasing the coverage down the road.  And…their hard won victory makes it even harder to win repeal of  SB-408  because the other sinkhole reforms that were “…not fully taken into account” by Citizens, provided the prime justification for OIR’s reduction of the request. Oops!

Soon sinkhole activity coverage will be dramatically less available and, when available, dramatically fewer will elect to buy it–especially residents of sinkhole alley whose only option is Citizens.

Here are some bullets on why this is true:

  •  The increase finally approved is a statewide average. Citizens sinkhole rate will still rise much more in sinkhole alley where only 20% purchase the coverage today.  And, it won’t even be available to those who don’t pass a pre-coverage inspection. Just like the majority of carriers, Citizens policyholders with pre-existing damage (settlement cracks, stucco damage, etc) will no longer be able to buy the coverage at any price; from Citizens or anywhere else!
  • Senator Fasano testified at the hearing that US Bank was an “example” of a mortgage company requiring sinkhole activity coverage.  False!  US Bank is the only one requiring sinkhole activity coverage and other banks will not be joining them. Unlike the rumor, neither Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac or any other bank require the purchase of sinkhole activity coverage.  If they did, 80% of Citizens sinkhole alley policyholders could not be without it.
  • SB-408 will dramatically reduce the involvement of public adjusters as protagonists in filing sinkhole claims. Remember, with Citizens, PA’s can only collect a percentage of the difference between the final payment and what Citizens originally offered. Without the incentive of a big payout PA’s will put less and less pressure on policyholders to file frivolous or inflated claims and policyholders will be even less willing to pay the higher premiums for the coverage.
  • Coverage no longer exists for sidewalks, driveways and patios. This, along with a new, more stringent definition of sinkhole damage, will reduce the potential for unjust enrichment by Citizens policyholders.
  • And, most likely to have a profound impact, is the provision in  SB-408 specifically requiring the homeowner to spend any sinkhole claim payment on repairs.  This means no more mortgage pay-offs and summer vacations.  In fact, no unjust enrichment for the policyholder and no money to pay a public adjuster means no reason to file a false or inflated claim at all; and that means no reason to buy the coverage when you’ve already got catastrophic collapse at no additional charge.

Keep in mind Senator Fasano’s response to the letter from Hernando County Property Appraiser, Alvin Mazourek, who lamented that the county’s tax base had eroded nearly 50%.  Senator Fasano wrote…

 “…I agree with your assertion that insurance monies set aside for sinkhole home repairs should be spent on those repairs and not diverted for other purposes. Sinkhole homes left unrepaired do nothing but cause economic damage in the form of dangerous dwellings, homes that probably won’t ever sell and homes that are not sinkhole residences but are unfortunate enough to be near an unrepaired sinkhole home.”

CAUTION: this last bullet is only effective IF Citizens immediately implements a hold-back or other payment methodology that insures the claimant spends the money on repairs. The statute does not restrict Citizens ability to hold-back payment or to make the claim check payable jointly to the named insured and the repair facility.

Citizens should move expeditiously to implement procedures that guarantee sinkhole claimants comply with the new law which includes advising applicants for the coverage that they acknowledge they will have to spend claim payments entirely on repairs.

##end##

 

facebookShare on Facebook
TwitterPost on X
FollowFollow us
PinterestSave

Filed Under: Citizens, Public Adjusters, Sinkholes

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Primary Sidebar

Unless otherwise attributed, articles on this site are the opinions of Scott Johnson.

To subscribe to Scott’s blog…

JS Contributors

Don Brown
Particularly on insurance issues, Don Brown brings expert legislative acumen to the JS team. First elected in 2000 he emerged as an architect on numerous insurance related reforms, predominantly Property Insurance. He’s been an independent insurance agent for over 25 years and is currently a sought-after speaker, consultant and author. Learn more
David Thompson, AAI, CPCU, CRIS
David Thompson has a well-deserved reputation across the country as a preeminent expert in the Property & Casualty field. Learn more
Bill Wilson, CPCU, ARM, AIM, AAM
Bill is one of the most respected speakers and writers on P & C issues in the U.S. He is recognized by his peers as someone who can explain complicated technical subjects in an easily understood and interesting fashion. His list of accomplishments and awards is legendary. For good reason his books, articles and consulting services are in continuous demand. Learn more
Barry Zalma, ESQ. CFE
Johnson Strategies has relied upon Mr. Zalma on numerous occasions for his research and insight into matters of insurance fraud, bad faith, relevant case law and expert analysis. Learn more

Order Scott’s Books

Collapse of an Evil Empire

Fraud and greed pushed home insurers to the brink. Something bold had to be done. This is the story of the disbarment of Florida’s most prolific litigator leading to the most comprehensive tort reforms in Florida, and perhaps American, history.

What's Past is Prologue

Lessons from the Worst Insurance Crisis in Florida’s History... ASSIGNMENT OF BENEFITS

Fact & Fallacy

Essays & Opinions on Florida's Most Controversial Insurance Topics.

Platforms of Success

What the New Generation of Elite Sellers are Doing and How it Can Work for You!

From Cartels to Competition

The Evolution of Insurance and the History of Florida’s Independent Agent

Recent blog posts

  • AGENTS, ADJUSTERS, INSURERS BEWARE—THE RED FLAGS OF FRAUD!
  • The Delicate Balance: Addressing MGA Concerns Without Creating Market Uncertainty
  • Are Florida’s MGA’s Under Attack?!
  • A Smarter Approach to Hurricane-Resilient Homes and Insurance Stability…
  • How Do Other Jurisdictions Manage Hurricane Risk Exposure?

Blog Archive

  • April 2025 (1)
  • March 2025 (2)
  • February 2025 (2)
  • January 2025 (2)
  • October 2024 (3)
  • September 2024 (2)
  • August 2024 (2)
  • May 2024 (1)
  • January 2024 (1)
  • October 2023 (4)
  • September 2023 (2)
  • April 2023 (1)
  • March 2023 (2)
  • February 2023 (3)
  • January 2023 (1)
  • December 2022 (2)
  • November 2022 (1)
  • August 2022 (2)
  • July 2022 (1)
  • June 2022 (1)
  • May 2022 (2)
  • March 2022 (4)
  • February 2022 (3)
  • January 2022 (3)
  • November 2021 (2)
  • October 2021 (3)
  • September 2021 (1)
  • August 2021 (3)
  • July 2021 (4)
  • April 2021 (5)
  • March 2021 (3)
  • February 2021 (6)
  • January 2021 (6)
  • December 2020 (2)
  • October 2020 (3)
  • September 2020 (2)
  • August 2020 (2)
  • July 2020 (1)
  • June 2020 (2)
  • April 2020 (1)
  • March 2020 (1)
  • February 2020 (1)
  • January 2020 (1)
  • August 2019 (2)
  • June 2019 (1)
  • March 2019 (1)
  • January 2019 (1)
  • December 2018 (1)
  • November 2018 (1)
  • September 2018 (1)
  • July 2018 (1)
  • June 2018 (2)
  • October 2017 (2)
  • September 2017 (1)
  • August 2017 (1)
  • June 2017 (1)
  • April 2017 (2)
  • March 2017 (2)
  • February 2017 (1)
  • December 2016 (1)
  • October 2016 (1)
  • August 2016 (2)
  • July 2016 (1)
  • June 2016 (1)
  • March 2016 (2)
  • February 2016 (1)
  • January 2016 (2)
  • November 2015 (1)
  • October 2015 (1)
  • September 2015 (1)
  • August 2015 (2)
  • July 2015 (2)
  • June 2015 (2)
  • May 2015 (1)
  • April 2015 (2)
  • March 2015 (1)
  • February 2015 (3)
  • January 2015 (1)
  • December 2014 (2)
  • November 2014 (4)
  • October 2014 (1)
  • September 2014 (2)
  • August 2014 (2)
  • July 2014 (2)
  • June 2014 (2)
  • May 2014 (3)
  • April 2014 (2)
  • March 2014 (3)
  • February 2014 (3)
  • January 2014 (2)
  • December 2013 (2)
  • November 2013 (2)
  • October 2013 (2)
  • September 2013 (2)
  • August 2013 (2)
  • July 2013 (3)
  • June 2013 (2)
  • May 2013 (3)
  • April 2013 (2)
  • March 2013 (3)
  • February 2013 (5)
  • January 2013 (2)
  • December 2012 (4)
  • November 2012 (3)
  • October 2012 (4)
  • August 2012 (5)
  • July 2012 (5)
  • June 2012 (4)
  • May 2012 (3)
  • April 2012 (7)
  • March 2012 (3)
  • February 2012 (3)
  • January 2012 (5)
  • December 2011 (6)
  • November 2011 (7)
  • October 2011 (6)
  • September 2011 (2)
  • August 2011 (7)
  • July 2011 (7)
  • June 2011 (4)
  • May 2011 (4)

Tag Cloud

7-7-7 Plan Citizens Insurance oir Rick Scott sb-480 senator fasano senator richter
Unless otherwise attributed, articles on this site are the opinions of Scott Johnson.

Mission: Satisfaction Guaranteed

Johnson Strategies (JS) works to establish and achieve goals promoting products or idea's to customers, state policymakers and the consuming public. This is done on behalf of both corporate and individual clients, non-profit trade associations and membership societies. JS specializes in planning, communication and advocacy for a wide range of interests focused in the property and casualty insurance field. Our simple mission is to guarantee satisfaction based on a comprehensive needs analysis and mutually defined goals.

Categories

Popular Tags

7-7-7 Plan Citizens Insurance oir Rick Scott sb-480 senator fasano senator richter

Post Calendar

May 2025
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  
« Apr    

Recent Posts

  • AGENTS, ADJUSTERS, INSURERS BEWARE—THE RED FLAGS OF FRAUD!
  • The Delicate Balance: Addressing MGA Concerns Without Creating Market Uncertainty
  • Are Florida’s MGA’s Under Attack?!
  • A Smarter Approach to Hurricane-Resilient Homes and Insurance Stability…
  • How Do Other Jurisdictions Manage Hurricane Risk Exposure?
  • PART II of “What Agents Need to Know About Public Adjusters…
  • Latest Decision on AOB!

[footer_backtotop]

Copyright 2012, Johnson Strategies LLC. Website design/development by Cali Design LLC