• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Johnson Strategies LLC - Test

Planning, Communications, Advocacy

  • Home
  • The JS Story
  • About JS
    • Mission
    • About Scott
    • Writing
  • Videos
  • Library
    • AOB prior to reforms effective July 1, 2019
    • AOB on and after reforms effective July 1, 2019
    • Citizens
    • Legislative Glossary
    • Government Studies and Reports
    • Miscellaneous Documents
    • Presentations and Powerpoints
  • Links
    • Government
    • Other Helpful Sites
  • Contact
You are here: Home / Sinkholes / US BANK…Not So Fast!

US BANK…Not So Fast!

December 14, 2011 - Opinion by Scott Johnson 2 Comments

Questions have arisen regarding the rescission by US Bank of an asinine requirement that  its Florida borrowers purchase sinkhole “activity” coverage.  It was the only lender to have such a mandate.  Neither Fannie or Freddie required it of lenders. Eighty percent of those in sinkhole alley insured in Citizens don’t buy it.

Now that US Bank has joined the ranks of the rational, two questions (perhaps more) arise, as follows:

1)  Does US Bank’s rescission apply only to new loans, and;

2)  Who reimburses policyholders for the premiums they paid for a coverage they didn’t want or, maybe didn’t even need? After all, US Bank’s notice is tacit admission it was wrong.

As to question one, I have not contacted US Bank and don’t need (or want) to.  I’ve read the language. It is clear to me (I’m not a lawyer), that its notice applies to all mortgages, not just those effective on or after December 7.  The notice states…

“Effective with loans closing on December 7, 2011 or after, sinkhole coverage will not be required in the State of Florida.”

If you read this as carefully as US Bank wrote it, you’ll see the notice is only saying that the effective date begins at the same time as or “with” new loans closing on December 7, 2011.  And, on that date…”Sinkhole coverage will not be required in Florida.” Emphasis added.

Besides, even if US Bank could know when the coverage is dropped from an existing policy, I seriously doubt it would hold the borrower in default or force place the coverage having rescinded the requirement for others with identical loans.  That’s not only asking for PR trouble, but…for legal action–obviously not from Sean Shaw’s firm.:)

And, why do you think US Bank stated in its notice that the requirement could be reinstated if an inspection reveals problems or if an appraisal reveals “settlement deficiencies”?  It’s obvious to me that was just to give the appearance that the original requirement being rescinded was reasonable.  Heck, if there are “settlement deficiencies” you can’t find coverage anyway; even from Citizens. Get serious!

Now, to the second question above;  “Who reimburses policyholders for the premiums they paid for a coverage they didn’t want or, maybe didn’t even need?”

Remember, we’re not talking peanuts here.  US Bank’s borrowers struggled to pay premiums that were as much as $4,000 per policy–often more than the entire rest of their homeowners’ coverage’s, including wind. Non-US Bank borrowers were never required to buy “activity” coverage.  The law specifically said it was optional.  And again; those who called US Bank and could speak with the right person, were exempt as well.  Is there no penalty for such discriminatory and irresponsible behavior on the part of US Bank?

In the loudest of voices Sean Shaw, Bill Newton and Ginny Stevans spread the lie that homes without sinkhole activity coverage would be foreclosed. I have it in writing from each of them.  Senator Fasano stated it on camera during the sinkhole rate hearing and numerous times in committee hearings. But…it wasn’t true!  Aren’t they even a little bit culpable here?

As a matter of equity, shouldn’t consumers who didn’t know that a phone call to US Bank could save them thousands be reimbursed; especially if they can prove they bought the coverage and never filed a claim?

What’s wrong with advocates who wouldn’t advocate for such reimbursement when, in fact, they are almost as responsible as US Bank?  Why aren’t they working to right this wrong?

Maybe a law firm somewhere will pick up the mantle for the thousands who feel ripped off. But, don’t expect to hear a peep from The Florida Consumer Action Network and Policyholders of Florida; Sean Shaw, Bill Newton, Ginny Stevans, and Senator Fasano.

To help consumers in this case, they’d have to admit they were wrong!

##end##

 IMPORTANT:  If you enjoyed this post you’re invited to subscribe for automatic notifications by going to: www.scottjohnsonflorida.com.  Enter your email address where indicated.  If you’re already on the website at Johnson Strategies, LLC:  go to the home page and enter your email address on the right hand side.  Remember, you’ll receive an email confirming your acceptance, so…check and clear your spam filter for notifications from Johnson Strategies, LLC.  ENJOY!

 

 

 

 

 

Share this articleEmail this to someoneShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInTweet about this on Twitter

Filed Under: Sinkholes

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. CDuncan says

    December 15, 2011 at 2:38 pm

    Great article again Scott! Earth movement is not covered under the standard HO policy anywhere in America. At least Florida covers cat ground collapse. The rest is either uninsurable or should be priced at actuarial sound rates. One day we’ll start to bring some sanity bank into the HO market in Florida…

    Log in to Reply
    • scott says

      December 15, 2011 at 4:23 pm

      Yep, and it’s likely that US Bank doesn’t require earthquake, mudslide, or other forms of earth movement in other states. That’s why this whole thing was so sad and why, if I were a US Bank borrower who purchased the coverage, I’d be kinda ticked; maybe I’d even want them to reimburse me.

      Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Primary Sidebar

Unless otherwise attributed, articles on this site are the opinions of Scott Johnson.



Order Scott’s Books

What's Past is Prologue

Lessons from the Worst Insurance Crisis in Florida’s History... ASSIGNMENT OF BENEFITS

Fact & Fallacy

Essays & Opinions on Florida's Most Controversial Insurance Topics.

Platforms of Success

What the New Generation of Elite Sellers are Doing and How it Can Work for You!
Learn More at www.Platformsofsuccess.com

From Cartels to Competition

The Evolution of Insurance and the History of Florida's Independent Insurance Agent.
Learn More at www.faia.com

Recent blog posts

  • Collapse of an Evil Empire! PART VII—Market Impact
  • Collapse of an Evil Empire! PART VI—The Sentence
  • Collapse of an Evil Empire! PART V–Guilty as Charged!
  • Point of Personal Privilege–Jeff Grady’s Retirement
  • Collapse of an Evil Empire! PART IV ½–Update

Blog Archive

  • October 2020 (3)
  • September 2020 (2)
  • August 2020 (2)
  • July 2020 (1)
  • June 2020 (2)
  • April 2020 (1)
  • March 2020 (1)
  • February 2020 (1)
  • January 2020 (1)
  • August 2019 (2)
  • June 2019 (1)
  • March 2019 (1)
  • January 2019 (1)
  • December 2018 (1)
  • November 2018 (1)
  • September 2018 (1)
  • July 2018 (1)
  • June 2018 (2)
  • October 2017 (2)
  • September 2017 (1)
  • August 2017 (1)
  • June 2017 (1)
  • April 2017 (2)
  • March 2017 (2)
  • February 2017 (1)
  • December 2016 (1)
  • October 2016 (1)
  • August 2016 (2)
  • July 2016 (1)
  • June 2016 (1)
  • March 2016 (2)
  • February 2016 (1)
  • January 2016 (2)
  • November 2015 (1)
  • October 2015 (1)
  • September 2015 (1)
  • August 2015 (2)
  • July 2015 (2)
  • June 2015 (2)
  • May 2015 (1)
  • April 2015 (2)
  • March 2015 (1)
  • February 2015 (3)
  • January 2015 (1)
  • December 2014 (2)
  • November 2014 (4)
  • October 2014 (1)
  • September 2014 (2)
  • August 2014 (2)
  • July 2014 (2)
  • June 2014 (2)
  • May 2014 (3)
  • April 2014 (2)
  • March 2014 (3)
  • February 2014 (3)
  • January 2014 (2)
  • December 2013 (2)
  • November 2013 (2)
  • October 2013 (2)
  • September 2013 (2)
  • August 2013 (2)
  • July 2013 (3)
  • June 2013 (2)
  • May 2013 (3)
  • April 2013 (2)
  • March 2013 (3)
  • February 2013 (5)
  • January 2013 (2)
  • December 2012 (4)
  • November 2012 (3)
  • October 2012 (4)
  • August 2012 (5)
  • July 2012 (5)
  • June 2012 (4)
  • May 2012 (3)
  • April 2012 (7)
  • March 2012 (3)
  • February 2012 (3)
  • January 2012 (5)
  • December 2011 (6)
  • November 2011 (7)
  • October 2011 (6)
  • September 2011 (2)
  • August 2011 (7)
  • July 2011 (7)
  • June 2011 (4)
  • May 2011 (4)

Newsletter

Tag Cloud

7-7-7 Plan Citizens Insurance oir Rick Scott sb-480 senator fasano senator richter

Copyright 2012, Johnson Strategies LLC. Website design/development by Cali Design LLC