• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Johnson Strategies LLC - Test

Planning, Communications, Advocacy

  • Home
  • The JS Story
  • About JS
    • Mission
    • About Scott
    • Writing
  • Videos
  • Library
    • AOB prior to reforms effective July 1, 2019
    • AOB on and after reforms effective July 1, 2019
    • Citizens
    • Legislative Glossary
    • Government Studies and Reports
    • Miscellaneous Documents
    • Presentations and Powerpoints
  • Links
    • Government
    • Other Helpful Sites
  • Contact
You are here: Home / Public Adjusters / Public Adjuster Fee’s & Public Policy!

Public Adjuster Fee’s & Public Policy!

February 5, 2013 - Opinion by Scott Johnson Leave a Comment

They certainly don’t need any more bad press.  Still…recent stories about public adjusters are instructive and may even warn of real challenges ahead for Florida’s tenuous property market.

Here’s what I mean.

In the wake of Hurricane Sandy,  New Jersey’s Insurance Department circulated a bulletin warning PA’s against overcharging storm victims. According to the News Release some were requiring up to a 50% contingency fee–siphoning for themselves half of what the policyholder had paid for.

“Unconscionable” was the word New Jersey’s Acting Commissioner Ken Kobylowski used to describe what was taking place.

Then, early last week, in a Special to the Miami Herald defense attorney Jason Wolf published an enlightening account of how PA’s drive up everyone’s costs with what he called “…no risk” sales pitches “…that money is out there for the taking.”  He warned consumers to “think twice before hiring a public adjuster” and cited their “…statutorily mandated…” contingency fees for driving up premiums.

Those stories were punctuated last Friday when CFO, Jeff Atwater announced arrests stemming from yet another public adjuster fraud ring.  And…as further proof a Citizens inspector general needs to report directly to the FSC as CFO Atwater has requested, and that it also be charged with examining external Citizens threats, as I have suggested–guess which carrier this criminal enterprise targeted?

No surprise–it was Citizens (again) notifying DFS that Miami Public Adjuster, Roberto Alvarez (44), was suspected of submitting $270,000 in fraudulent claims, on behalf of four homeowners he  recruited to file and inflate various types of fake losses, especially burglaries. (See NOTE#1 below)

And, why did he do it?

According to the DFS announcement and consistent with everything we know to be true about PA contingency fees, it was…”in order to increase his commissions.”

Keep in mind, this is something Alvarez and far too many other public adjusters have done in spite of a Citizens fee limit of 10% of the difference between the original offer and the final payout. The same shenanigans occur in the private market where the cap is 10% or 20% of the total payout for regular and declared emergency claims respectively. Two separate situations requiring two separate contingency fee statutes.

Now, here’s where it gets scary…

Slightly over a month ago, public adjusters retained a prominent, well connected Tallahassee law firm (D’Alemberte and Palmer) to overturn both of Florida’s fee limitation statutes (Case No 2011-CA-842). If they succeed public adjusters will be able to charge pretty much whatever they want, for both Citizens and for private carriers–you know, like in New Jersey!

I peg their chances at about 50/50; roughly the same odds I gave on the challenge to the 48 hour solicitation ban which the PA’s overturned last year.  (See NOTE #2 below)

Prior to statutory fee restrictions Florida’s problems were not unlike those reported in New Jersey. Numerous legislative working groups and task forces found PA abuses to be significant enough to not only warrant fee limitations but, licensing, advertising and unfair business practice reforms as well.

Some say this is why the number of Florida PA’s have diminished in recent years.  Others say, without storms in Florida, they’ve trekked to New Orleans, and points north to “assist” the victims of Katrina and Sandy.

Point is, another percentage now comes prominently into play…it’s 100%! That’s how many claims public adjuster ads and advertorials at least imply require their attention…all of them.

Citizens public documents show that, for some perils, PA’s already file and handle nearly 80% of the claims. Even in the private market, depending on the peril and location of the risk, it’s often over 70%.

BEGGING THE QUESTIONS: What would the percentage of PA involvement be if the courts throw out any limitation on their fee’s? What would be the moral hazard for those like Roberto Alvarez?

Florida’s fragile property system couldn’t survive, in my opinion, making it incumbent on lawmakers to enact methods to limit PA compensation without the use of a contingency fee cap.

For many of the same reasons that Florida capped contingency percentages, some states prohibit public adjuster contingency fee’s altogether. Consistent with the press accounts above, I believe their statutes refer to them as…“against public policy”.

Anyway…if Florida’s contingency fee limitations are overturned, as I think they might be, someone better get real serious about implementing language limiting PA’s to a reasonable hourly fee based on the work performed and the hours it took to perform that work.

Anything else should be…bad public policy!

##end##

NOTE #1: Anyone with information of suspected insurance fraud is asked to call 1-800-378-0445. Those who provide tips can remain anonymous. The Department of Financial Services to date has awarded almost $275,000 to more than 40 citizens as part of its Anti-Fraud Reward Program. The program rewards individuals up to $25,000 for information that directly leads to an arrest and conviction in an insurance fraud scheme.

NOTE #2: Florida public adjusters won a constitutional argument that Florida Statute 626.854(6) wrongly banned all solicitation for 48 hours in violation of the Florida Constitution. In The opinion the court rejected the DFS argument that the statute is ambiguous enough to result in an interpretation that it applies only to the time, place, and manner of commercial solicitation. “We hold that the statute unambiguously bans all solicitation for 48 hours and that this restriction on commercial speech violates Article I, § 4 of the Florida Constitution under the standards of Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service Commission of New York, 447 U.S. 557 (1980).”  For more see my blog titled: Public Adjusters–Free Speech & Paragraph (K).

IMPORTANT:  If you enjoyed this post you’re invited to subscribe for automatic notifications by going to: www.scottjohnsonflorida.com.  Enter your email address where indicated.  If you’re already on the website at Johnson Strategies, LLC:  go to the home page and enter your email address on the right hand side.  Remember, you’ll receive an email confirming your acceptance, so…check and clear your spam filter for notifications from Johnson Strategies, LLC.  ENJOY!

 

Share this articleEmail this to someoneShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInTweet about this on Twitter

Filed Under: Public Adjusters

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Primary Sidebar

Unless otherwise attributed, articles on this site are the opinions of Scott Johnson.



Order Scott’s Books

What's Past is Prologue

Lessons from the Worst Insurance Crisis in Florida’s History... ASSIGNMENT OF BENEFITS

Fact & Fallacy

Essays & Opinions on Florida's Most Controversial Insurance Topics.

Platforms of Success

What the New Generation of Elite Sellers are Doing and How it Can Work for You!
Learn More at www.Platformsofsuccess.com

From Cartels to Competition

The Evolution of Insurance and the History of Florida's Independent Insurance Agent.
Learn More at www.faia.com

Recent blog posts

  • Collapse of an Evil Empire! PART VII—Market Impact
  • Collapse of an Evil Empire! PART VI—The Sentence
  • Collapse of an Evil Empire! PART V–Guilty as Charged!
  • Point of Personal Privilege–Jeff Grady’s Retirement
  • Collapse of an Evil Empire! PART IV ½–Update

Blog Archive

  • October 2020 (3)
  • September 2020 (2)
  • August 2020 (2)
  • July 2020 (1)
  • June 2020 (2)
  • April 2020 (1)
  • March 2020 (1)
  • February 2020 (1)
  • January 2020 (1)
  • August 2019 (2)
  • June 2019 (1)
  • March 2019 (1)
  • January 2019 (1)
  • December 2018 (1)
  • November 2018 (1)
  • September 2018 (1)
  • July 2018 (1)
  • June 2018 (2)
  • October 2017 (2)
  • September 2017 (1)
  • August 2017 (1)
  • June 2017 (1)
  • April 2017 (2)
  • March 2017 (2)
  • February 2017 (1)
  • December 2016 (1)
  • October 2016 (1)
  • August 2016 (2)
  • July 2016 (1)
  • June 2016 (1)
  • March 2016 (2)
  • February 2016 (1)
  • January 2016 (2)
  • November 2015 (1)
  • October 2015 (1)
  • September 2015 (1)
  • August 2015 (2)
  • July 2015 (2)
  • June 2015 (2)
  • May 2015 (1)
  • April 2015 (2)
  • March 2015 (1)
  • February 2015 (3)
  • January 2015 (1)
  • December 2014 (2)
  • November 2014 (4)
  • October 2014 (1)
  • September 2014 (2)
  • August 2014 (2)
  • July 2014 (2)
  • June 2014 (2)
  • May 2014 (3)
  • April 2014 (2)
  • March 2014 (3)
  • February 2014 (3)
  • January 2014 (2)
  • December 2013 (2)
  • November 2013 (2)
  • October 2013 (2)
  • September 2013 (2)
  • August 2013 (2)
  • July 2013 (3)
  • June 2013 (2)
  • May 2013 (3)
  • April 2013 (2)
  • March 2013 (3)
  • February 2013 (5)
  • January 2013 (2)
  • December 2012 (4)
  • November 2012 (3)
  • October 2012 (4)
  • August 2012 (5)
  • July 2012 (5)
  • June 2012 (4)
  • May 2012 (3)
  • April 2012 (7)
  • March 2012 (3)
  • February 2012 (3)
  • January 2012 (5)
  • December 2011 (6)
  • November 2011 (7)
  • October 2011 (6)
  • September 2011 (2)
  • August 2011 (7)
  • July 2011 (7)
  • June 2011 (4)
  • May 2011 (4)

Newsletter

Tag Cloud

7-7-7 Plan Citizens Insurance oir Rick Scott sb-480 senator fasano senator richter

Copyright 2012, Johnson Strategies LLC. Website design/development by Cali Design LLC