• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Johnson Strategies LLC - Test

Planning, Communications, Advocacy

  • Home
  • The JS Story
  • About JS
    • Mission
    • About Scott
    • Writing
  • Videos
  • Library
    • AOB prior to reforms effective July 1, 2019
    • AOB on and after reforms effective July 1, 2019
    • Citizens
    • Legislative Glossary
    • Government Studies and Reports
    • Miscellaneous Documents
    • Presentations and Powerpoints
  • Links
    • Government
    • Other Helpful Sites
  • Contact
You are here: Home / Public Adjusters / Policyholder Rights & a 10% PA fee cap!

Policyholder Rights & a 10% PA fee cap!

March 18, 2014 - Opinion by Scott Johnson Leave a Comment

You’ve read my posts on the abuse of Assignment of Benefits (AOB) by emergency remediators, contractors, roofers, et.al.  Emerging legislative shenanigans might be better understood if you read them again–especially one titled “Another Rip-Off”. 

Likely you know  that, due to exorbitant referral fees for first responders like plumbers and pervasive fraud from secondary responders like water extraction companies, Florida loss costs are among America’s highest. Indeed, contrary to some political views, abuse and  fraud from cottage industries drives costs as much as reinsurance. In part, because large chunks of reinsurance are driven by retail level fraud from the same cottage industries.

Former Insurance Consumer Advocate (ICA) Robin Westcott’s claims task force exposed massive abuse from emergency remediators.  Now there’s a slate of recommendations championed by CFO Jeff Atwater and the current ICA, Steve Burgess.

Opposition from public adjusters, water extraction companies and trial lawyers was predictable.   They’re pulling out all stops to keep their golden ox from being gored by the AOB reforms once contained in CS/CS/SB-708 or those in its companion HB-743.

It’s disheartening to hear some lawmakers feign various levels of confusion or outrage to justify voting against these common sense consumer protections. In fact, after senators on the Banking & Insurance committee deadlocked (6 to 6) on Wednesday of last week,  the AOB reforms were reluctantly removed by the bills sponsor the next day during the Senate Appropriations Committee–reforms simply intended  to help consumers. (See NOTE#1 below)

Consumer friendly AOB reform language, however, was adopted in the house the day before. That’s good. But, it only sets the stage for lengthy negotiations that often evaporate any premium savings.

Unfortunately, language in both bills acceptable to insurers (as long as needed AOB reforms are included) and passionately embraced by CFO Atwater, called the Policyholder Bill of Rights, is caught in the crossfire. And, to a lesser extent, so is post loss underwriting reform spawned by Universal Property & Casualty Insurance Company (UPCIC) and a few other helpful reforms. (See NOTE#2 below)

So much consumer benefit at stake. What to do?

Let the process work…or not work, as the case may be?

Maybe.  But, I do have one suggestion. It’s both strategic and consumer centric.

Based on public adjuster testimony in New Jersey and elsewhere there’s a direct correlation between higher fee caps and fraudulent claim inflation and the manufacturing of claims “where none existed.”

Therefore, at the first available opportunity amend both bills to reduce the fee cap for public adjusters to the recognized standard of 10% across the board; instead of 20% for non-catastrophic claims. It is, after all, America’s highest percentage cap.

Makes sense. CS/CS/SB-708 & HB-743 deal with property claims and at 20%  Florida consumers lose more of their non-catastrophic claim dollar, sometimes twice as much, as claimants in any other state with caps.

At one point a reduction was part of HB-743. Moreover it was supported by Steve Burgess and several public adjuster groups. (See: “Florida Consumers pay too much). 

Seems like a bill that provides claimants with a bill of rights should also make sure they have the same rights and protections provided to claimants in other states.

##end##

NOTE #1: Language stricken from SB-708 reads:
For a residential property insurance policy, an agreement purporting to assign post-loss benefits for repair or
replacement is a valid assignment only if the agreement:

(a) Requires the assignee to notify the insurance company

within 48 hours of the assignment. If the contact information

for the insurer is unavailable for the first 48 hours, the

assignee shall contact the company as soon as practicable;

(b) Limits the assignment to the contracted work to be

performed and is restricted to claims for damage to structures

covered under the policy;

(c) Specifies the estimated scope and price of the work

before it is performed;

(d) Prohibits the assignee from charging the policy owner

for any portion of the repair or replacement beyond the

applicable deductible contained in the insurance policy;

(e) Prohibits a person performing any portion of the repair

or replacement on behalf of the assignee from charging the

policy owner;

(f) Prohibits the assignee from retaining insurance proceeds that are earmarked by the insurer for payment of work to be performed by vendors other than the assignee; and

(g) Requires the assignee to guarantee that the work performed for the loss event conforms to the most recent, accepted industry standards.

NOTE #2: Language in CS/CS/SB-708 dealing with post loss underwriting prevents insurers from denying claims or canceling an insurance policy based on credit information available in the public record if the insurance policy or contract has been in effect for more than 90days.

CFO Atwater’s Bill of Rights also contained in CS/CS/SB-708/HB-743, requires insurers to provide claimants within 14 days after the notice of a claim a copy of the Policyholder’s Bill of Rights explaining the right to:

  • Receive acknowledgment of the reported claim and necessary claim forms within 14 days after the claim is communicated to the insurance company.
  • Receive confirmation within 30 days that the claim is covered in full, partially covered, or denied, or receive a written statement that a claim is being investigated.
  • Receive within 90 days full settlement payment for the claim or payment of the undisputed portion of the claim or the insurance company’s denial of the claim.
  • Receive free mediation of the claim by the DFS under most circumstances and subject to certain restrictions.
  • Receive a neutral evaluation of a disputed sinkhole claim covered by the policy.

IMPORTANT: If you enjoyed this post you’re invited to subscribe for automatic notifications by going to: www.johnsonstrategiesllc.com.  Enter your email address where indicated.  If you’re already on the website at Johnson Strategies, LLC, go to the home page and enter your email address on the right hand side.  Remember, you’ll receive an email confirming your acceptance, so…check and clear your spam filter for notifications from Johnson Strategies, LLC.  ENJOY!

Share this articleEmail this to someoneShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInTweet about this on Twitter

Filed Under: Public Adjusters

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Primary Sidebar

Unless otherwise attributed, articles on this site are the opinions of Scott Johnson.



Order Scott’s Books

What's Past is Prologue

Lessons from the Worst Insurance Crisis in Florida’s History... ASSIGNMENT OF BENEFITS

Fact & Fallacy

Essays & Opinions on Florida's Most Controversial Insurance Topics.

Platforms of Success

What the New Generation of Elite Sellers are Doing and How it Can Work for You!
Learn More at www.Platformsofsuccess.com

From Cartels to Competition

The Evolution of Insurance and the History of Florida's Independent Insurance Agent.
Learn More at www.faia.com

Recent blog posts

  • Collapse of an Evil Empire! PART VII—Market Impact
  • Collapse of an Evil Empire! PART VI—The Sentence
  • Collapse of an Evil Empire! PART V–Guilty as Charged!
  • Point of Personal Privilege–Jeff Grady’s Retirement
  • Collapse of an Evil Empire! PART IV ½–Update

Blog Archive

  • October 2020 (3)
  • September 2020 (2)
  • August 2020 (2)
  • July 2020 (1)
  • June 2020 (2)
  • April 2020 (1)
  • March 2020 (1)
  • February 2020 (1)
  • January 2020 (1)
  • August 2019 (2)
  • June 2019 (1)
  • March 2019 (1)
  • January 2019 (1)
  • December 2018 (1)
  • November 2018 (1)
  • September 2018 (1)
  • July 2018 (1)
  • June 2018 (2)
  • October 2017 (2)
  • September 2017 (1)
  • August 2017 (1)
  • June 2017 (1)
  • April 2017 (2)
  • March 2017 (2)
  • February 2017 (1)
  • December 2016 (1)
  • October 2016 (1)
  • August 2016 (2)
  • July 2016 (1)
  • June 2016 (1)
  • March 2016 (2)
  • February 2016 (1)
  • January 2016 (2)
  • November 2015 (1)
  • October 2015 (1)
  • September 2015 (1)
  • August 2015 (2)
  • July 2015 (2)
  • June 2015 (2)
  • May 2015 (1)
  • April 2015 (2)
  • March 2015 (1)
  • February 2015 (3)
  • January 2015 (1)
  • December 2014 (2)
  • November 2014 (4)
  • October 2014 (1)
  • September 2014 (2)
  • August 2014 (2)
  • July 2014 (2)
  • June 2014 (2)
  • May 2014 (3)
  • April 2014 (2)
  • March 2014 (3)
  • February 2014 (3)
  • January 2014 (2)
  • December 2013 (2)
  • November 2013 (2)
  • October 2013 (2)
  • September 2013 (2)
  • August 2013 (2)
  • July 2013 (3)
  • June 2013 (2)
  • May 2013 (3)
  • April 2013 (2)
  • March 2013 (3)
  • February 2013 (5)
  • January 2013 (2)
  • December 2012 (4)
  • November 2012 (3)
  • October 2012 (4)
  • August 2012 (5)
  • July 2012 (5)
  • June 2012 (4)
  • May 2012 (3)
  • April 2012 (7)
  • March 2012 (3)
  • February 2012 (3)
  • January 2012 (5)
  • December 2011 (6)
  • November 2011 (7)
  • October 2011 (6)
  • September 2011 (2)
  • August 2011 (7)
  • July 2011 (7)
  • June 2011 (4)
  • May 2011 (4)

Newsletter

Tag Cloud

7-7-7 Plan Citizens Insurance oir Rick Scott sb-480 senator fasano senator richter

Copyright 2012, Johnson Strategies LLC. Website design/development by Cali Design LLC