• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Johnson Strategies LLC - Test

Planning, Communications, Advocacy

  • Home
  • The JS Story
  • About JS
    • Mission
    • About Scott
    • Writing
  • Videos
  • Library
    • AOB prior to reforms effective July 1, 2019
    • AOB on and after reforms effective July 1, 2019
    • Citizens
    • Legislative Glossary
    • Government Studies and Reports
    • Miscellaneous Documents
    • Presentations and Powerpoints
  • Links
    • Government
    • Other Helpful Sites
  • Contact
You are here: Home / General Property Issues / Flood Rebating Prohibited…This is Seismic!

Flood Rebating Prohibited…This is Seismic!

April 4, 2012 - Opinion by Scott Johnson Leave a Comment

In what many agents and carriers will find monumental, though for widely diverging reasons, the federal government has just instructed Write Your Own (WYO) flood carriers to cease allowing agents to rebate any portion of their commission.

For those rebating and those competing with those who rebate…this is seismic!

The memorandum (W-12026) explaining the decision was received just today by WYO carriers and the NFIP servicing agent in charge–it’s effective October 1, 2012 for both new and renewal business.  Signed by Edward Connor, Deputy Associate Administrator for Federal Insurance, its foundation was straight forward…

“The goals of the NFIP are better suited by a system of uniform national pricing that will insure that policyholders pay the same price for the same risk.”

Sounds like a done deal.  And it probably is, but…this wicket has always been far stickier than it appears.

After all, this isn’t the first time federal flood authorities have prohibited rebating.

I recall efforts by the Florida Association of Insurance Agents (FAIA), especially its venerable Director of Education, Bob Ross who, along with IIABA had done a good job convincing NFIP of the evils of rebating.

Once a prohibition was implemented, however, a large broker or two raised objections citing Florida’s supreme court decision (See NOTE #1, below) which outlawed the NAIC “anti-rebating” statute lobbied by FAIA’s predecessor in 1915.  The case was brought by the Dade County Consumer Advocate, Walter Dartland who alleged the statute violated the due process clause of the Florida constitution. Click here for background and arguments.

Eventually NFIP reversed itself deferring to the rebating laws of each state. Today, only two states allow rebating; Florida, due to the supreme court decision, and California due to the infamous 1988 voter initiative, Prop-103.

With an absolute prohibition off-limits, Florida lawmakers saw fit to implement a strict set of statutory guidelines limiting the practice of rebating, (§626.572); one of which states:

“… rebates shall not be given to an insured with respect to a policy purchased from an insurer that prohibits its agents from rebating commissions…”

With this decision by the fed, WYO carriers are being directed to no longer authorize agents to rebate flood commissions.

It’s too early to tell exactly how the marketplace will react, but…it doesn’t bode well for those agencies founded as flood rebaters–agencies built on rebates that often exceeded more than half their commission income and that was the lure for other business.  They used the promise of a rebate on flood for large condo’s, for example, to attract the rest of the account, using whatever market they could find, mostly E&S and Citizens.

On the other hand, those who lost business to the rebaters, or who formed rebating subsidiaries to compete, may get a chance now to rebid that which they lost.

We’re talking millions in “commission” income!

Those interested in the background and history of Florida’s Anti-Rebating Law can read a white paper by the same name, drafted for FAIA a while back by yours truly.  Those with information on this decision or its impact, pro or con, please feel free to share it with me, in confidence if you prefer.

There’s more to come…count on it!

##end##

NOTE #1: In 1977 a licensed Florida insurance agent, Joseph Blumenthal, had sued the Florida DOI/OIR, arguing that the anti-rebate laws prevented him from competing. The lower court held that the laws were constitutional, and Mr. Blumenthal petitioned the state supreme court, but died during appeal and his case was dismissed.  In May of 1983, Walter Dartland, Director of the Dade County Consumer Advocates Office, picked up the case ultimately leading to a decision by the Supreme Court that the anti-rebating statute was unconstitutional.

IMPORTANT:  If you enjoyed this post you’re invited to subscribe for automatic notifications by going to: www.scottjohnsonflorida.com.  Enter your email address where indicated.  If you’re already on the website at Johnson Strategies, LLC:  go to the home page and enter your email address on the right hand side.  Remember, you’ll receive an email confirming your acceptance, so…check and clear your spam filter for notifications from Johnson Strategies, LLC.  ENJOY!

 

 

 

 

Share this articleEmail this to someoneShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInTweet about this on Twitter

Filed Under: General Property Issues

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Primary Sidebar

Unless otherwise attributed, articles on this site are the opinions of Scott Johnson.



Order Scott’s Books

What's Past is Prologue

Lessons from the Worst Insurance Crisis in Florida’s History... ASSIGNMENT OF BENEFITS

Fact & Fallacy

Essays & Opinions on Florida's Most Controversial Insurance Topics.

Platforms of Success

What the New Generation of Elite Sellers are Doing and How it Can Work for You!
Learn More at www.Platformsofsuccess.com

From Cartels to Competition

The Evolution of Insurance and the History of Florida's Independent Insurance Agent.
Learn More at www.faia.com

Recent blog posts

  • Collapse of an Evil Empire! PART VII—Market Impact
  • Collapse of an Evil Empire! PART VI—The Sentence
  • Collapse of an Evil Empire! PART V–Guilty as Charged!
  • Point of Personal Privilege–Jeff Grady’s Retirement
  • Collapse of an Evil Empire! PART IV ½–Update

Blog Archive

  • October 2020 (3)
  • September 2020 (2)
  • August 2020 (2)
  • July 2020 (1)
  • June 2020 (2)
  • April 2020 (1)
  • March 2020 (1)
  • February 2020 (1)
  • January 2020 (1)
  • August 2019 (2)
  • June 2019 (1)
  • March 2019 (1)
  • January 2019 (1)
  • December 2018 (1)
  • November 2018 (1)
  • September 2018 (1)
  • July 2018 (1)
  • June 2018 (2)
  • October 2017 (2)
  • September 2017 (1)
  • August 2017 (1)
  • June 2017 (1)
  • April 2017 (2)
  • March 2017 (2)
  • February 2017 (1)
  • December 2016 (1)
  • October 2016 (1)
  • August 2016 (2)
  • July 2016 (1)
  • June 2016 (1)
  • March 2016 (2)
  • February 2016 (1)
  • January 2016 (2)
  • November 2015 (1)
  • October 2015 (1)
  • September 2015 (1)
  • August 2015 (2)
  • July 2015 (2)
  • June 2015 (2)
  • May 2015 (1)
  • April 2015 (2)
  • March 2015 (1)
  • February 2015 (3)
  • January 2015 (1)
  • December 2014 (2)
  • November 2014 (4)
  • October 2014 (1)
  • September 2014 (2)
  • August 2014 (2)
  • July 2014 (2)
  • June 2014 (2)
  • May 2014 (3)
  • April 2014 (2)
  • March 2014 (3)
  • February 2014 (3)
  • January 2014 (2)
  • December 2013 (2)
  • November 2013 (2)
  • October 2013 (2)
  • September 2013 (2)
  • August 2013 (2)
  • July 2013 (3)
  • June 2013 (2)
  • May 2013 (3)
  • April 2013 (2)
  • March 2013 (3)
  • February 2013 (5)
  • January 2013 (2)
  • December 2012 (4)
  • November 2012 (3)
  • October 2012 (4)
  • August 2012 (5)
  • July 2012 (5)
  • June 2012 (4)
  • May 2012 (3)
  • April 2012 (7)
  • March 2012 (3)
  • February 2012 (3)
  • January 2012 (5)
  • December 2011 (6)
  • November 2011 (7)
  • October 2011 (6)
  • September 2011 (2)
  • August 2011 (7)
  • July 2011 (7)
  • June 2011 (4)
  • May 2011 (4)

Newsletter

Tag Cloud

7-7-7 Plan Citizens Insurance oir Rick Scott sb-480 senator fasano senator richter

Copyright 2012, Johnson Strategies LLC. Website design/development by Cali Design LLC