• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Johnson Strategies LLC - Test

Planning, Communications, Advocacy

  • Home
  • The JS Story
  • About JS
    • Mission
    • About Scott
    • Writing
  • Videos
  • Library
    • AOB prior to reforms effective July 1, 2019
    • AOB on and after reforms effective July 1, 2019
    • Citizens
    • Legislative Glossary
    • Government Studies and Reports
    • Miscellaneous Documents
    • Presentations and Powerpoints
  • Links
    • Government
    • Other Helpful Sites
  • Contact
You are here: Home / General Property Issues / AOB & Roofers?!

AOB & Roofers?!

February 17, 2015 - Opinion by Scott Johnson Leave a Comment

Rapidly becoming Florida’s biggest residential insurance cost driver and once thought to involve mostly water extraction companies, abuse of AOB (Assignment of Benefits) has now metastasized into the roofing industry.

I use the phrase “roofing industry” loosely. The prime abusers don’t appear to be roofers at all but, fly-by-nighters, scammers and sometimes even criminals–with no experience, no license and, far too often… no conscience!

Similar to the bad apples of water extraction, they’ve learned their trade at trial lawyer seminars promising “insider secrets” on how to get the most out of AOB.

The Division of Insurance Fraud (DIF) is currently investigating over 100 claims involving abuse of AOB in the tri-county area of Hillsborough, Pinellas and Pasco counties. The result of roofers, or those posing as roofers, trolling neighborhoods, acting as public adjusters and promising new roofs at no cost–for damage that often isn’t even covered.

Incentivized by potential huge payoffs with little chance of any consequence and armed with “insider secrets”, they hire subs to do the actual work and force insurers to pay inflated bills.

Then, they stop paying the subs. Jobs are half done. Workmanship shoddy. Angry subs redress homeowners with liens and lawsuits. (See NOTE #1 below)

Homeowners, even angrier than the subs, turn to their insurers only to find they’ve already paid in full.

Here’s what I learned from one insurer only a few days ago.

For five years, from 2007 to 2012, hail claims were barely on its radar, accounting for a mere 1-2% of total claim volume.  Enter the “roving roofers” armed with “insider secrets”. In 2013 hail claims rocketed 700% to over 7.9% of its total claim volume.

Last year the same insurer had an astounding 11.24% of its total claim volume from hail.  In other words—for five years (2007-2012) it paid $1.8m in hail claims.  Then, in just two years (2013 and 2014) it spent $8.3 million!

What will 2015 look like for this insurer? What will premiums look like for Florida policyholders if every insurer suffers a 400% increase in fraudulent roofing claims?

Once you get the answer(s) add in the cost of AOB by water extractors inflating bills to cover deductibles and plumber “kickbacks” and you’re on the edge of another perfect storm similar to the one that drove sinkhole premiums up 5000%!

A few weeks back I was on a panel in Orlando for the Florida Chamber of Commerce discussing the widespread abuse of AOB. Last week I participated in a workshop for the House Banking and Insurance Committee on the same subject.

During the House Committee hearing some of my fellow panelists, including the usual suspects in support of AOB (trial lawyers, water extractors, et al) offered the same overriding theme:

“Get rid of the bad apples who abuse AOB but don’t get rid of AOB. It’s necessary to insure emergency remediators get paid!”

NOT TRUE!

Eighty percent of emergency remediation is performed by companies that don’t use AOB at all, but…they’re all being paid just fine.

Roofers too! In fact, most roofers haven’t even heard of AOB. According to testimony at the House hearing from Florida’s premier roofing organization, the Florida Roofing, Sheet Metal & Air Conditioning Association (FRSA), AOB abuses are rampant and AOB should be “done away with.”

Like honest water extractors, honest roofers have few problems getting paid for honest work!

While a myriad of solutions have been lofted, lawmakers still have the option of two lasered approaches, in my opinion.   One, ban the use of AOB in property insurance claims altogether, or; two, allow insurers to limit the use of AOB in the terms of their policies. (See NOTE #2 below)

Policyholders win with either approach!

##end##

NOTE #1:

Example 1–In October of 2014 the Division of Insurance Fraud released the following statement. “Today, we arrested five NBRC Roofing Company employees for organizing a $525,000 insurance fraud scheme. This Tampa-based company is accused of leaving 97 Florida homeowners with unfinished roof repairs and liens on their homes after stealing insurance money intended to pay subcontractors. Our investigation discovered the roofing scam involved visiting homeowners following a storm, convincing them roof repairs were necessary, helping the homeowners file insurance claims for repairs and finally convincing them to give NBRC the sole right to make the repairs and the assignment of benefits for the insurance claims. But once NBRC was paid for the insurance claim, the repairs would not be completed and the insurance money would be pocketed by NBRC employees.”

Example 2– In a previous blog on Assignment of Benefits I pointed to a roofer advising on insurance claims as a means to help people get a “free” roof. “We know Roofs and we Know Insurance Companies” they allege. At the time the website called Get Free Roofs.com described the company’s offer this way:

GET YOUR ROOF REPLACED BY YOUR INSURANCE COMPANY

  • PAY NOTHING for our inspection
  • PAY NOTHING for our detailed Insurance based estimate
  • PAY NOTHING, unless we get you a roof replacement and then PAY ONLY your deductible.

NOTE #2: Security First Insurance Company (SFIC) has sued OIR for denying it’s request to limit AOB’s in its’ policy form (AOB suit against OIR). In my previous blog titled “Assignment of Benefits…The Brewing Storm” I state that if SFIC wins “…the AOB problem conveniently and thankfully goes away.” There seems to be some debate about whether that’s true but, regardless of the courts’ decision, a well worded statutory change could also solve the problem, perhaps even on a more permanent basis.

IMPORTANT: If you enjoyed this post you’re invited to subscribe for automatic notifications by going to: www.johnsonstrategiesllc.com. Enter your email address where indicated. If you’re already on the website at Johnson Strategies, LLC, go to the home page and enter your email address on the right hand side. Remember, you’ll receive an email confirming your acceptance, so…check and clear your spam filter for notifications from Johnson Strategies, LLC. ENJOY

 

 

 

Share this articleEmail this to someoneShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInTweet about this on Twitter

Filed Under: General Property Issues

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Primary Sidebar

Unless otherwise attributed, articles on this site are the opinions of Scott Johnson.



Order Scott’s Books

What's Past is Prologue

Lessons from the Worst Insurance Crisis in Florida’s History... ASSIGNMENT OF BENEFITS

Fact & Fallacy

Essays & Opinions on Florida's Most Controversial Insurance Topics.

Platforms of Success

What the New Generation of Elite Sellers are Doing and How it Can Work for You!
Learn More at www.Platformsofsuccess.com

From Cartels to Competition

The Evolution of Insurance and the History of Florida's Independent Insurance Agent.
Learn More at www.faia.com

Recent blog posts

  • Collapse of an Evil Empire! PART VII—Market Impact
  • Collapse of an Evil Empire! PART VI—The Sentence
  • Collapse of an Evil Empire! PART V–Guilty as Charged!
  • Point of Personal Privilege–Jeff Grady’s Retirement
  • Collapse of an Evil Empire! PART IV ½–Update

Blog Archive

  • October 2020 (3)
  • September 2020 (2)
  • August 2020 (2)
  • July 2020 (1)
  • June 2020 (2)
  • April 2020 (1)
  • March 2020 (1)
  • February 2020 (1)
  • January 2020 (1)
  • August 2019 (2)
  • June 2019 (1)
  • March 2019 (1)
  • January 2019 (1)
  • December 2018 (1)
  • November 2018 (1)
  • September 2018 (1)
  • July 2018 (1)
  • June 2018 (2)
  • October 2017 (2)
  • September 2017 (1)
  • August 2017 (1)
  • June 2017 (1)
  • April 2017 (2)
  • March 2017 (2)
  • February 2017 (1)
  • December 2016 (1)
  • October 2016 (1)
  • August 2016 (2)
  • July 2016 (1)
  • June 2016 (1)
  • March 2016 (2)
  • February 2016 (1)
  • January 2016 (2)
  • November 2015 (1)
  • October 2015 (1)
  • September 2015 (1)
  • August 2015 (2)
  • July 2015 (2)
  • June 2015 (2)
  • May 2015 (1)
  • April 2015 (2)
  • March 2015 (1)
  • February 2015 (3)
  • January 2015 (1)
  • December 2014 (2)
  • November 2014 (4)
  • October 2014 (1)
  • September 2014 (2)
  • August 2014 (2)
  • July 2014 (2)
  • June 2014 (2)
  • May 2014 (3)
  • April 2014 (2)
  • March 2014 (3)
  • February 2014 (3)
  • January 2014 (2)
  • December 2013 (2)
  • November 2013 (2)
  • October 2013 (2)
  • September 2013 (2)
  • August 2013 (2)
  • July 2013 (3)
  • June 2013 (2)
  • May 2013 (3)
  • April 2013 (2)
  • March 2013 (3)
  • February 2013 (5)
  • January 2013 (2)
  • December 2012 (4)
  • November 2012 (3)
  • October 2012 (4)
  • August 2012 (5)
  • July 2012 (5)
  • June 2012 (4)
  • May 2012 (3)
  • April 2012 (7)
  • March 2012 (3)
  • February 2012 (3)
  • January 2012 (5)
  • December 2011 (6)
  • November 2011 (7)
  • October 2011 (6)
  • September 2011 (2)
  • August 2011 (7)
  • July 2011 (7)
  • June 2011 (4)
  • May 2011 (4)

Newsletter

Tag Cloud

7-7-7 Plan Citizens Insurance oir Rick Scott sb-480 senator fasano senator richter

Copyright 2012, Johnson Strategies LLC. Website design/development by Cali Design LLC