• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Johnson Strategies LLC - Test

Planning, Communications, Advocacy

  • Home
  • The JS Story
  • About JS
    • Mission
    • About Scott
    • Writing
  • Videos
  • Library
    • AOB prior to reforms effective July 1, 2019
    • AOB on and after reforms effective July 1, 2019
    • Citizens
    • Legislative Glossary
    • Government Studies and Reports
    • Miscellaneous Documents
    • Presentations and Powerpoints
  • Links
    • Government
    • Other Helpful Sites
  • Contact
You are here: Home / General Property Issues / AOB…Best Laid Plans!

AOB…Best Laid Plans!

June 26, 2015 - Opinion by Scott Johnson Leave a Comment

My plan for this report to be another on the AOB “blame game” was just preempted by the most recent in a series of hurtful court decisions.

For the past several years, insurers have been using every tool to fight AOB lawsuits that force them to pay inflated bills from water extractors and roofers. Instead of just paying fraudulent claims and/or reducing their coverage, they went to court. And, for a period of time they actually won more than they lost.

But, last month things took an ugly turn in the 4th DCA. And on Monday, June 22nd, the last hope for consumers was dashed by the 1st DCA regarding Security First Insurance Company (SFIC) vs. the Office of Insurance Regulation (OIR)–a case that’s been pending for over seven months and, in my opinion, would’ve stopped the abusers cold..

In early skirmishes a few insurers refused to be blackmailed by the threat of add-on attorney fees. They argued they had no obligation to pay obviously inflated invoices if a covered loss hadn’t been proven. Ultimately that didn’t fly. They attacked the language of the AOB documents as overly broad, saying the contractor exceeded the scope of his services. Nixed again. They even argued that the contractor had no insurable interest as required by Florida law–and made more arguments, again with mixed results.

Some opined their best point was that it didn’t make sense to assign benefits when the existence of benefits (a covered loss) had not yet been established. Others disagreed and went in different directions.

Then came Black Tuesday–May 20, 2015. The 4th DCA rendered three major and debilitating decisions, in essence rejecting all insurer defenses from lower court victories, including the assertion that an unaccrued benefit cannot be assigned.

The common thread, from both the 4th DCA and the 1st DCA, however, was not that AOB isn’t harmful. Like the OIR in denying SFIC’s form language, neither district denied the harm AOB causes consumers but, they locked arms in saying the courts cannot solve the problem.

The legislature must solve the problem!

For now Security First will weigh its’ option to appeal to the supreme court. But, even if it decides to do so, there would be no result before lawmakers next come to town.

For the best insights on why this suit was filed and why the court erred in its decision, as well as some background, check out the analysis by the Colodny Fass Law Firm, who plead the case on behalf of Security First, here.

You may want to read SFIC’s press release to get a feel for the impact this unfortunate decision will have on AOB abuse, and thus rates, going forward–said impact is not good!

You can also read the entire decision here. It’s only five pages total.

What now?

I hear from both consumers and agents. The former complaining about unsavory solicitations or mistreatment. The latter complaining about dwindling loss ratios, upset clients or the outright cancellation of a carrier appointment.

While it may sound odd to say so…consumers are depending on the insurance industry to fight this good fight; on their behalf. And, their agents are confused trying to steer clients away from the troublemakers, if they can determine who they are.

The industry must regroup, unify and focus.

Lawmakers too. Last sessions’ efforts at reform yielded little more than a choreographed performance to avoid blame.

AOB and its tributary issues have become Florida’s number one cost driver and the single greatest reason why we have the highest homeowners premiums in America after almost a decade without a storm.

Next year, insurers need to get consumers to hold their elected officials accountable for any further failures to act.

##end##

IMPORTANT: If you enjoyed this post you’re invited to subscribe for automatic notifications by going to: www.johnsonstrategiesllc.com. Enter your email address where indicated. If you’re already on the website at Johnson Strategies, LLC, go to the home page and enter your email address on the right hand side. Remember, you’ll receive an email confirming your acceptance, so…check and clear your spam filter for notifications from Johnson Strategies, LLC. ENJOY

 

Share this articleEmail this to someoneShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInTweet about this on Twitter

Filed Under: General Property Issues

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Primary Sidebar

Unless otherwise attributed, articles on this site are the opinions of Scott Johnson.



Order Scott’s Books

What's Past is Prologue

Lessons from the Worst Insurance Crisis in Florida’s History... ASSIGNMENT OF BENEFITS

Fact & Fallacy

Essays & Opinions on Florida's Most Controversial Insurance Topics.

Platforms of Success

What the New Generation of Elite Sellers are Doing and How it Can Work for You!
Learn More at www.Platformsofsuccess.com

From Cartels to Competition

The Evolution of Insurance and the History of Florida's Independent Insurance Agent.
Learn More at www.faia.com

Recent blog posts

  • Collapse of an Evil Empire! PART VII—Market Impact
  • Collapse of an Evil Empire! PART VI—The Sentence
  • Collapse of an Evil Empire! PART V–Guilty as Charged!
  • Point of Personal Privilege–Jeff Grady’s Retirement
  • Collapse of an Evil Empire! PART IV ½–Update

Blog Archive

  • October 2020 (3)
  • September 2020 (2)
  • August 2020 (2)
  • July 2020 (1)
  • June 2020 (2)
  • April 2020 (1)
  • March 2020 (1)
  • February 2020 (1)
  • January 2020 (1)
  • August 2019 (2)
  • June 2019 (1)
  • March 2019 (1)
  • January 2019 (1)
  • December 2018 (1)
  • November 2018 (1)
  • September 2018 (1)
  • July 2018 (1)
  • June 2018 (2)
  • October 2017 (2)
  • September 2017 (1)
  • August 2017 (1)
  • June 2017 (1)
  • April 2017 (2)
  • March 2017 (2)
  • February 2017 (1)
  • December 2016 (1)
  • October 2016 (1)
  • August 2016 (2)
  • July 2016 (1)
  • June 2016 (1)
  • March 2016 (2)
  • February 2016 (1)
  • January 2016 (2)
  • November 2015 (1)
  • October 2015 (1)
  • September 2015 (1)
  • August 2015 (2)
  • July 2015 (2)
  • June 2015 (2)
  • May 2015 (1)
  • April 2015 (2)
  • March 2015 (1)
  • February 2015 (3)
  • January 2015 (1)
  • December 2014 (2)
  • November 2014 (4)
  • October 2014 (1)
  • September 2014 (2)
  • August 2014 (2)
  • July 2014 (2)
  • June 2014 (2)
  • May 2014 (3)
  • April 2014 (2)
  • March 2014 (3)
  • February 2014 (3)
  • January 2014 (2)
  • December 2013 (2)
  • November 2013 (2)
  • October 2013 (2)
  • September 2013 (2)
  • August 2013 (2)
  • July 2013 (3)
  • June 2013 (2)
  • May 2013 (3)
  • April 2013 (2)
  • March 2013 (3)
  • February 2013 (5)
  • January 2013 (2)
  • December 2012 (4)
  • November 2012 (3)
  • October 2012 (4)
  • August 2012 (5)
  • July 2012 (5)
  • June 2012 (4)
  • May 2012 (3)
  • April 2012 (7)
  • March 2012 (3)
  • February 2012 (3)
  • January 2012 (5)
  • December 2011 (6)
  • November 2011 (7)
  • October 2011 (6)
  • September 2011 (2)
  • August 2011 (7)
  • July 2011 (7)
  • June 2011 (4)
  • May 2011 (4)

Newsletter

Tag Cloud

7-7-7 Plan Citizens Insurance oir Rick Scott sb-480 senator fasano senator richter

Copyright 2012, Johnson Strategies LLC. Website design/development by Cali Design LLC